Re: [Sqlgrey-users] VERP

[Lionel B. <lio...@bo...>]

Michel Bouissou wrote the following on 16.02.2005 10:11 :

>Le Mercredi 16 F=E9vrier 2005 00:50, Lionel Bouton a =E9crit :
> =20
>
>>Side note : today I realized that I could fine tune the VERP handling.
>>Now SQLgrey use the "#" replacements in the connect table. I think it
>>could be wise to not put the modified adresses into the connect table
>>but wait them to be greylisted and then use the "#" replaced adresses
>>only in the awl tables.
>>   =20
>>
>
>Looks like a good idea even though I'm not sure it will make a big diffe=
rence=20
>on a practical standpoint.
>
>But you need to make sure that you trim the localpart <=3D 64 chars anyw=
ay,=20
>because some VERP or SRS localparts may be longer (actually the RFC limi=
t to=20
>64 chars is not enforced by any modern MTA, only by some old broken ones=
, and=20
>you can find some legitimate mail with longer localparts).
> =20
>

Already coded in CVS like that :-)
I removed deVERP/SRS code from the recipient processing too as it never=20
enters any AWL.