From: Lionel B. <lio...@bo...> - 2010-01-31 14:31:40
|
Michal Ludvig a écrit, le 01/28/2010 04:55 AM : > [...] > I'm sure SPF awareness would be nice to have. SPF support is a recurrent topic. I'm surprised it comes again and again. There are 2 reasons why I don't think including it is a good thing : - I'm not sure there are efficient SPAM-fighting behaviours we can implement based on SPF records that wouldn't be possible by configuring Postfix with a separate SPF policy service, - SQLgrey treats incoming mails sequentially. It can do so because it only uses very-low latency queries, querying SPF records is orders of magnitude slower. For people with more than a few mails/minute, SQLgrey+SPF will become a bottleneck. Lionel |