Re: [Sqlgrey-users] Is sqlgrey dead?

[Karl O. P. <ko...@me...>]

On 04/20/2009 06:36:18 AM, Patrick Vande Walle wrote:

> > So -- what do we get from Net::CIDR that we can't have without? The
> > point is that sqlgrey shouldn't have unneeded dependencies that only
> > make the installation more difficult.

> There is that general advantage of using proven, maintained code vs
> writing
> an application-specific one. If the Perl modules gets a bug fix, so
> will
> your application that depends on it.

This makes sense to me.  Reinventing the wheel to keep down
dependencies seems counterproductive in today's world of modern
package management systems.


Karl <ko...@me...>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                  -- Robert A. Heinlein