Re: [Sqlgrey-users] Is sqlgrey dead?

[Michal L. <ml...@lo...>]

Bob Apthorpe wrote:

> I used Net::CIDR if it was there, otherwise I stuck with the
> existing code

Aha. In that case the non-Net::CIDR implementation of IPv6 handling
should be fixed anyway, shouldn't it ;-)

And once everything works without Net::CIDR there's little point adding
a dependency on another nonstandard module. Unless it brings features
not available otherwise of course.

So -- what do we get from Net::CIDR that we can't have without? The
point is that sqlgrey shouldn't have unneeded dependencies that only
make the installation more difficult.

Michal