Re: [Sqlgrey-users] Is sqlgrey dead?

[<sql...@xe...>]

On Wednesday April 08 2009 1:29:27 pm Dan Faerch wrote:
> * Replies will be sent through Spamex to
> sql...@li... * For additional info click ->
> http://www.spamex.com/i/?v=25917804
>
> sql...@xe... wrote:
> > Just curious, but there has been no updates since August 5, 2007 in which
> > the last version, 1.7.6 (devel) was released.
>
> The 1.7.5 and 1.7.6 was released by me, to add a bunch of new features.
> 1.7.5 added my new features and 1.7.6 fixed whatever bugs i had in my code.
>
> I think Lionel wanted to see the devel version work for a good while,
> before flagging it as "stable", but never got around to it :).. I forgot
> about it as well, as "it just worked" for me. And this mailinglist got
> all quiet, which usually means "everything is fine".
>
> I think we can call it stable by now ;) I run it under very heavy load
> in a 10 server cluster. No problems.
>
> >  I currently use this version on my production server and it works just
> > fine.  So is this a if it isn't broken don't fix it scenario, or has
> > development just halted?
>
> It just works fine i guess.. Theres really nothing more to add at the
> moment :).
>
> - Dan
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--- This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
> Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
> _______________________________________________
> Sqlgrey-users mailing list
> Sql...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlgrey-users

Well, I guess that answers my question.  I am glad there are still developers 
still around.  Between greylisting and spamhaus (SBL) checking, spam is cut 
down by probably 90%.  I can't really complain ;).  I actually do have one 
question, but I'll post that in a separate email.

Thanks!