[Sqlalchemy-tickets] Issue #3221: More detailed "develop" guidelines (zzzeek/sqlalchemy)
Brought to you by:
zzzeek
|
From: jvanasco <iss...@bi...> - 2014-10-06 15:31:59
|
New issue 3221: More detailed "develop" guidelines https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/issue/3221/more-detailed-develop-guidelines jvanasco: It would be nice to extend http://www.sqlalchemy.org/develop.html with a few things to further help contributions: * Preferred method of submissions: ** bitbucket vs github ** develop on master/branch or create a release/issue branch. if release/issue, is there a preferred naming convention? ** should the fix be based on the branch on master, a release, etc * should a fix be backported? are there any critera for this? if so, are there any guidelines? * Is there anything that the package maintainers would prefer in terms of workflow or style that is not covered by the above or the existing guidelines |