[Sqlalchemy-commits] commit/sqlalchemy: 3 new changesets
Brought to you by:
zzzeek
From: Bitbucket <com...@bi...> - 2013-08-20 17:29:40
|
3 new commits in sqlalchemy: https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/commits/b13a434f6fb2/ Changeset: b13a434f6fb2 Branch: master User: zzzeek Date: 2013-08-20 19:27:27 Summary: Fixed bug where list instrumentation would fail to represent a setslice of ``[0:0]`` correctly, which in particular could occur when using ``insert(0, item)`` with the association proxy. Due to some quirk in Python collections, the issue was much more likely with Python 3 rather than 2. Also in 0.8.3, 0.7.11. [ticket:2807] Affected #: 5 files https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/commits/36de3538c104/ Changeset: 36de3538c104 Branch: rel_0_8 User: zzzeek Date: 2013-08-20 19:28:21 Summary: Fixed bug where list instrumentation would fail to represent a setslice of ``[0:0]`` correctly, which in particular could occur when using ``insert(0, item)`` with the association proxy. Due to some quirk in Python collections, the issue was much more likely with Python 3 rather than 2. Also in 0.8.3, 0.7.11. [ticket:2807] Conflicts: doc/build/changelog/changelog_09.rst Affected #: 4 files https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/commits/4bcd7e38e12c/ Changeset: 4bcd7e38e12c Branch: rel_0_7 User: zzzeek Date: 2013-08-20 19:29:14 Summary: Fixed bug where list instrumentation would fail to represent a setslice of ``[0:0]`` correctly, which in particular could occur when using ``insert(0, item)`` with the association proxy. Due to some quirk in Python collections, the issue was much more likely with Python 3 rather than 2. Also in 0.8.3, 0.7.11. [ticket:2807] Conflicts: doc/build/changelog/changelog_09.rst Conflicts: doc/build/changelog/changelog_08.rst Affected #: 3 files Repository URL: https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/ -- This is a commit notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving this because you have the service enabled, addressing the recipient of this email. |