Re: [Sqlalchemy-tickets] [sqlalchemy] #2721: SQLAlchemy leaks the deferrable keyword in FKs for mysql databases

[sqlalchemy <mi...@zz...>]

#2721: SQLAlchemy leaks the deferrable keyword in FKs for mysql databases
---------------------------+----------------------------------
      Reporter:  kashif    |      Owner:
          Type:  defect    |     Status:  new
      Priority:  high      |  Milestone:  0.8.xx
     Component:  mysql     |   Severity:  minor - half an hour
    Resolution:            |   Keywords:  mysql deferrable
Progress State:  in queue  |
---------------------------+----------------------------------
Changes (by zzzeek):

 * status_field:  needs questions answered => in queue


Comment:

 OK so you are still getting a rough equivalent of "deferrable" with MySQL
 here, which was what I was curious about.  Since MySQL's foreign keys are
 kind of fungible I can see how its fine to skip the keyword on this
 platform.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2721#comment:3>
sqlalchemy <http://www.sqlalchemy.org/>
The Database Toolkit for Python