sql-ledger-users

[SL] Best Linux OS for SL?

[ATM L. <atm...@km...>]

Normally I use SME/Mitel/E-smith for my SL installes, however I have a site
that wants SL, already has a SME doing way to many other tasks.. what would
the"list" recomend for simple Linux OS to install SL as a stand alone
server??
 
Thanks,
 
PS, sorry if this is a duplicate.. I did not see my post arrive last
time....

Re: [SL] Best Linux OS for SL?

[George O. <geo...@ya...>]

On Saturday 10 March 2007 16:30, ATM Logic wrote:
> Normally I use SME/Mitel/E-smith for my SL installes, however I have a site
> that wants SL, already has a SME doing way to many other tasks.. what would
> the"list" recomend for simple Linux OS to install SL as a stand alone
> server??
>
> Thanks,
>

I don't think there is a difference. Whatever distro you're comfortable with 
just install it and run SL. I tried RedHat, Debian and SuSe and as far as SL 
goes I did not see any diference.

George

Re: [SL] Best Linux OS for SL?

[Gene C. <gc...@so...>]

Hi,

I'd suggest Using Centos as you are already familiar with it.  SME 7 is 
based on Centos.  Use the single-server CD.

This may be of help, but if you find any errors, please let me know.  YMMV

http://www.sonoracomm.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=80&Itemid=32

G

ATM Logic wrote:
> Normally I use SME/Mitel/E-smith for my SL installes, however I have a site
> that wants SL, already has a SME doing way to many other tasks.. what would
> the"list" recomend for simple Linux OS to install SL as a stand alone
> server??
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> PS, sorry if this is a duplicate.. I did not see my post arrive last
> time....
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> sql-ledger-users mailing list
> sql...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users

-- 

=============================
Gene Cooper
Sonora Communications, Inc.
5531 N. Oracle Road
Tucson, AZ  85704

(520) 293-8461 x101
(520) 888-4060 fax

gc...@so...

Re: [SL] Best Linux OS for SL?

[Vladimir B. <vl...@bo...>]

> Normally I use SME/Mitel/E-smith for my SL installes, however I have
> a site that wants SL, already has a SME doing way to many other
> tasks.. what would the"list" recomend for simple Linux OS to install
> SL as a stand alone server??
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> PS, sorry if this is a duplicate.. I did not see my post arrive last
> time....

Hello, as a standalone server consider FreeBSD. Get rid of the X and
desktop management configuration, just install the applications you need
for SL (apache, sql, ...) Also the security management will be easier.
If you decide for linux try Debian or Redhat server. No SUSe after M$
aliance.

Cheers, -vlado

Re: [SL] Best Linux OS for SL?

[Jeff R. <je...@jr...>]

Hi ATM Logic

I agree with Vlad, I installed it on a FreeBSD box and the install 
couldn't have been simpler. There is a port for SQL-Ledger, (it was 
version 2.6.22 when i installed in Dec)  and one command (make install) 
will fetch the whole of SQL, Apache and Postgres, install all of them 
and all dependancies and you are ready to run. It took about three or 
four hours for FreeBSD to fetch everything, compile it all and install 
it but I just watched TV and when I came back I edited one config file 
and it all ran perfectly. Like Vlad points out, you don't need X on the 
server so it can run on any old box.

Jeff


Vladimir Botka wrote:
>> Normally I use SME/Mitel/E-smith for my SL installes, however I have
>> a site that wants SL, already has a SME doing way to many other
>> tasks.. what would the"list" recomend for simple Linux OS to install
>> SL as a stand alone server??
>>  
>> Thanks,
>>  
>> PS, sorry if this is a duplicate.. I did not see my post arrive last
>> time....
>>     
>
> Hello, as a standalone server consider FreeBSD. Get rid of the X and
> desktop management configuration, just install the applications you need
> for SL (apache, sql, ...) Also the security management will be easier.
> If you decide for linux try Debian or Redhat server. No SUSe after M$
> aliance.
>
> Cheers, -vlado
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> sql-ledger-users mailing list
> sql...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users
>
>
>   

Re: [SL] Best Linux OS for SL?

[ATM L. <atm...@km...>]

Ok...  Well, I am game for Free-BSD, and have played with it a bit..., If I
have the power, any reason I should still not go with the GUI?  (Will be run
on a HP Xeon 2Ghz with 512M, not sure what drive/drives I will put in yet...

Also, here for the BSD
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.2/

Then this to install SL
To install the port: cd /usr/ports/finance/sql-ledger/ && make install clean
To add the package: pkg_add -r sql-ledger

(Do I have to add the package???  First?/After?/Never?)

When its done will I be good to PDF invoices?  Or am I back to trying to get
everything working again?

Thanks for the Ideas, I will be going FreeBSD unless it gets too cranky,
then I will give up and go CentOS...
	
I guess the bigest Question would be ... Could/Should/I leave the GUI etc??/
If I did, can you think of any other 'Kewl' uses for it?

---Andrew
ATM Logic

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sql...@li... 
> [mailto:sql...@li...] On 
> Behalf Of Jeff Roberts
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 1:45 PM
> To: sql...@li...
> Subject: Re: [SL] Best Linux OS for SL?
> 
> Hi ATM Logic
> 
> I agree with Vlad, I installed it on a FreeBSD box and the 
> install couldn't have been simpler. There is a port for 
> SQL-Ledger, (it was version 2.6.22 when i installed in Dec)  
> and one command (make install) will fetch the whole of SQL, 
> Apache and Postgres, install all of them and all dependancies 
> and you are ready to run. It took about three or four hours 
> for FreeBSD to fetch everything, compile it all and install 
> it but I just watched TV and when I came back I edited one 
> config file and it all ran perfectly. Like Vlad points out, 
> you don't need X on the server so it can run on any old box.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> Vladimir Botka wrote:
> >> Normally I use SME/Mitel/E-smith for my SL installes, 
> however I have 
> >> a site that wants SL, already has a SME doing way to many other 
> >> tasks.. what would the"list" recomend for simple Linux OS 
> to install 
> >> SL as a stand alone server??
> >>  
> >> Thanks,
> >>  
> >> PS, sorry if this is a duplicate.. I did not see my post 
> arrive last 
> >> time....
> >>     
> >
> > Hello, as a standalone server consider FreeBSD. Get rid of 
> the X and 
> > desktop management configuration, just install the applications you 
> > need for SL (apache, sql, ...) Also the security management 
> will be easier.
> > If you decide for linux try Debian or Redhat server. No 
> SUSe after M$ 
> > aliance.
> >
> > Cheers, -vlado
> >
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join 
> > SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief 
> surveys-and earn 
> > cash 
> > 
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEV
> > DEV _______________________________________________
> > sql-ledger-users mailing list
> > sql...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join 
> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to 
> share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief 
> surveys-and earn cash 
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge
> &CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> sql-ledger-users mailing list
> sql...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users
> 

Re: [SL] Best Linux OS for SL?

[Tony <to...@in...>]

My personal feeling is that a server should be just that ' a server '. GUI 
addons only serve to waste resources and add potential security holes. I also 
tend to sperate 'services' and dedicate a box for each one if possible for 
the same reasons.

I've had SL running on BSD 5.x without a problem, however i used the official 
installer instead of what was in the ports tree. There was a bit of manual 
labor to get all the components setup but its pretty straight forward.

And to answer  you question about first/last/etc:  if you do make install on a 
port, it installs it for you and you dont need to install the package 
afterwards. ( its sort of redundant )

its also best to stick with ports, and not packages if you can. Ports is the 
preferred way for any BSD application, packages are just there for 
convenience.

On Sunday 11 March 2007 09:30 am, ATM Logic wrote:
> Ok...  Well, I am game for Free-BSD, and have played with it a bit..., If I
> have the power, any reason I should still not go with the GUI?  (Will be
> run on a HP Xeon 2Ghz with 512M, not sure what drive/drives I will put in
> yet...
>
> Also, here for the BSD
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.2/
>
> Then this to install SL
> To install the port: cd /usr/ports/finance/sql-ledger/ && make install
> clean To add the package: pkg_add -r sql-ledger
>
> (Do I have to add the package???  First?/After?/Never?)
>
> When its done will I be good to PDF invoices?  Or am I back to trying to
> get everything working again?
>
> Thanks for the Ideas, I will be going FreeBSD unless it gets too cranky,
> then I will give up and go CentOS...
>
> I guess the bigest Question would be ... Could/Should/I leave the GUI
> etc??/ If I did, can you think of any other 'Kewl' uses for it?
>
> ---Andrew
> ATM Logic
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sql...@li...
> > [mailto:sql...@li...] On
> > Behalf Of Jeff Roberts
> > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 1:45 PM
> > To: sql...@li...
> > Subject: Re: [SL] Best Linux OS for SL?
> >
> > Hi ATM Logic
> >
> > I agree with Vlad, I installed it on a FreeBSD box and the
> > install couldn't have been simpler. There is a port for
> > SQL-Ledger, (it was version 2.6.22 when i installed in Dec)
> > and one command (make install) will fetch the whole of SQL,
> > Apache and Postgres, install all of them and all dependancies
> > and you are ready to run. It took about three or four hours
> > for FreeBSD to fetch everything, compile it all and install
> > it but I just watched TV and when I came back I edited one
> > config file and it all ran perfectly. Like Vlad points out,
> > you don't need X on the server so it can run on any old box.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > Vladimir Botka wrote:
> > >> Normally I use SME/Mitel/E-smith for my SL installes,
> >
> > however I have
> >
> > >> a site that wants SL, already has a SME doing way to many other
> > >> tasks.. what would the"list" recomend for simple Linux OS
> >
> > to install
> >
> > >> SL as a stand alone server??
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> PS, sorry if this is a duplicate.. I did not see my post
> >
> > arrive last
> >
> > >> time....
> > >
> > > Hello, as a standalone server consider FreeBSD. Get rid of
> >
> > the X and
> >
> > > desktop management configuration, just install the applications you
> > > need for SL (apache, sql, ...) Also the security management
> >
> > will be easier.
> >
> > > If you decide for linux try Debian or Redhat server. No
> >
> > SUSe after M$
> >
> > > aliance.
> > >
> > > Cheers, -vlado
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > > --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join
> > > SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> > > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief
> >
> > surveys-and earn
> >
> > > cash
> >
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEV
> >
> > > DEV _______________________________________________
> > > sql-ledger-users mailing list
> > > sql...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----------
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join
> > SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> > share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief
> > surveys-and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge
> > &CID=DEVDEV
> > _______________________________________________
> > sql-ledger-users mailing list
> > sql...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> sql-ledger-users mailing list
> sql...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users

Re: [SL] Best Linux OS for SL?

[Wallace R. C. <wrc...@gm...>]

On 3/11/07, Tony <to...@in...> wrote:
> My personal feeling is that a server should be just that ' a server '. GUI
> addons only serve to waste resources and add potential security holes. I also
> tend to sperate 'services' and dedicate a box for each one if possible for
> the same reasons.

I agree on both points.

> I've had SL running on BSD 5.x without a problem, however i used the official
> installer instead of what was in the ports tree. There was a bit of manual
> labor to get all the components setup but its pretty straight forward.

As Shakespeare wrote, "Aye, there's the rub."

I've used FreeBSD in the past & found that it requires a bit of
tinkering.  Nothing wrong with that, but I often don't have the time
to tinker, so I've fallen back to using Fedora Core on my server
boxes.  "It just works."
-- 
Best Regards,
Wallace