Menu
▾
▴
sql-ledger-users
|
From: Jeff S. <js...@en...> - 2002-02-19 23:47:34
|
Actually, I'm going to be administering SQL-Ledger remotely and would like
to print to the default queue on the server, so the "PRINT" buttons on the
forms would be nice if they printed locally instead of just invoking my
browser's print function.
I have a number of workarounds for this, but I just wanted to double-check
and make sure that those "PRINT" buttons don't do anything (or maybe they
do and my install is just screwed up).
Definitely agree on the merits of CSS, but I agree more strongly with the
old "beggars can't be choosers" adage ;)
Thanks,
-Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: sql...@li...
[mailto:sql...@li...]On Behalf Of Sergio
A. Kessler
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 6:39 PM
To: Jeff Strope; sql...@li...
Subject: Re: Printing
actually, you can use the print button of your browser,
but you don't want the form's buttons to print right ?
the easy solution for this is to use css to define a
non printable class, like this:
@media print {
.noprint { /* items with this class won't print */
display: none;
}
}
then you modify the source to include
<div class=noprint>
..... <form's buttons> .....
</div>
hey, you even can define things that don't
display on screen but print
@media screen {
.noscreen { /* items with this class won't display */
display: none;
}
}
it would be good for sql-ledger to use more css...
/sergio
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Strope" <js...@en...>
> I'm pretty sure this has been covered in the past, but I just want to make
> sure.
>
> The "Print Invoice" & "Print Order" (etc) form buttons do not actually
send
> documents to printers installed on the server, correct?
NOTICE: When replying, please Reply to the list address. This way other
members know if the issues have been resolved or not. Thanks! Your List
administrator.
|
|
From: Dieter S. <dsi...@sq...> - 2002-02-20 00:45:20
|
Well, I guess we found a volunteer to write a new stylesheet. Thanks, Sergio! You just let me know which markup tags should be added / changed and I'll adjust the code. Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Sergio A. Kessler wrote: > actually, you can use the print button of your browser, > but you don't want the form's buttons to print right ? > > the easy solution for this is to use css to define a > non printable class, like this: > > @media print { > .noprint { /* items with this class won't print */ > display: none; > } > } > > then you modify the source to include > <div class=noprint> > ..... <form's buttons> ..... > </div> > > hey, you even can define things that don't > display on screen but print > > @media screen { > .noscreen { /* items with this class won't display */ > display: none; > } > } > > it would be good for sql-ledger to use more css... > > /sergio > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Strope" <js...@en...> > > > > I'm pretty sure this has been covered in the past, but I just want to make > > sure. > > > > The "Print Invoice" & "Print Order" (etc) form buttons do not actually > send > > documents to printers installed on the server, correct? > > > NOTICE: When replying, please Reply to the list address. This way other members know if the issues have been resolved or not. Thanks! Your List administrator. > > |
|
From: Sergio A. K. <ser...@ho...> - 2002-02-21 14:44:03
Attachments:
sql-ledger.css
|
here is a css a little more complete... (but not complete in any way) now, sql-ledger should include the stylesheet on every page... /sergio ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dieter Simader" <dsi...@sq...> > Well, I guess we found a volunteer to write a new stylesheet. Thanks, > Sergio! You just let me know which markup tags should be added / changed > and I'll adjust the code. > > > Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 > DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 > =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Sergio A. Kessler wrote: > > > actually, you can use the print button of your browser, > > but you don't want the form's buttons to print right ? > > > > the easy solution for this is to use css to define a > > non printable class, like this: > > > > @media print { > > .noprint { /* items with this class won't print */ > > display: none; > > } > > } > > > > then you modify the source to include > > <div class=noprint> > > ..... <form's buttons> ..... > > </div> > > > > hey, you even can define things that don't > > display on screen but print > > > > @media screen { > > .noscreen { /* items with this class won't display */ > > display: none; > > } > > } > > > > it would be good for sql-ledger to use more css... > > > > /sergio > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jeff Strope" <js...@en...> > > > > > > > I'm pretty sure this has been covered in the past, but I just want to make > > > sure. > > > > > > The "Print Invoice" & "Print Order" (etc) form buttons do not actually > > send > > > documents to printers installed on the server, correct? > > > > > > NOTICE: When replying, please Reply to the list address. This way other members know if the issues have been resolved or not. Thanks! Your List administrator. > > > > > > > NOTICE: When replying, please Reply to the list address. This way other members know if the issues have been resolved or not. Thanks! Your List administrator. > > |
|
From: Oscar B. <os...@el...> - 2002-02-20 07:45:17
|
Correct. Just use your browser button to print. Oscar Jeff Strope wrote: > I'm pretty sure this has been covered in the past, but I just want to make > sure. > > The "Print Invoice" & "Print Order" (etc) form buttons do not actually send > documents to printers installed on the server, correct? > > Thanks, > > Jeff Strope > > > > NOTICE: When replying, please Reply to the list address. This way other members know if the issues have been resolved or not. Thanks! Your List administrator. > > -- _____________________________________________________________ Oscar Buijten Tel: +33.4.67.57.97.45 Fax: +33.4.67.57.97.46 GSM: +33.6.20.84.15.22 Email: os...@el... Web: www.elbie.com |
|
From: Kenneth G. <la...@th...> - 2002-02-17 02:33:43
|
yes works. and you get two copies of my reply kg On Saturday 16 February 2002 22:38, Wil Cooley wrote: > Also Sprach Kenneth Gonsalves <la...@th...> on Sat, Feb 16, 2002 > at 02:44:50AM PST > > > hi all > > i have been regularly posting to this list, but since i am a subscriber > > to several lists, i automatically delete any list message 'from' me > > without reading it. so i just discovered that none of my posts are coming > > to the list - they are all going to the individual to whom i am replying. > > personally i feel that when pressing the 'reply' button on a message in a > > list, the reply should go to the list - else it is a big headache, and i > > feel the list members are also losing in the sense that many replies to > > problems faced are not appearing on the list at all. could the list admin > > do something about this? > > Try the 'reply-to-all' button. > > Wil |
|
From: <ke...@dk...> - 2002-02-16 18:12:37
|
I think it is great that sourceforge have turned this option off, and take it as yet another reason to stay with sourceforge. Automatic Reply-to has always annoyed me and none of the lists I administer use it. Kind regards Keld On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Dieter Simader wrote: > Sourceforge has turned off the Reply-To list feature because apparently it > is not proper email etiquette to force a reply-to. I too, on the other > hand, feel that everyone on the list looses because a lot of the members > on the list reply directly rather than to the list. This is evident when > you look at the question/answer ratio. > > If someone has a suggestion of moving the list to another server please > let me know and I'll move it. It's a great deal of work for me but I think > it is worthwhile in the long run. > > I am not all that happy with how Sourceforge is handling various issues, > including this tiny tidbit with the mailing lists. > > > Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 > DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 > =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > > > hi all > > i have been regularly posting to this list, but since i am a subscriber to > > several lists, i automatically delete any list message 'from' me without > > reading it. so i just discovered that none of my posts are coming to the list > > - they are all going to the individual to whom i am replying. personally i > > feel that when pressing the 'reply' button on a message in a list, the reply > > should go to the list - else it is a big headache, and i feel the list > > members are also losing in the sense that many replies to problems faced are > > not appearing on the list at all. could the list admin do something about > > this? > > kg > > > > > |
|
From: Rod R. <ro...@su...> - 2002-02-16 18:35:59
|
Well I feel it's close to a non-issue, as users always get to choose where their mail goes. What the default reply-to does is "suggest" where most replies should go. Since replies tend to be answers to questions, and of interest to more than one person, I prefer the reply-to header. That way more good stuff gets into the archives. Of course I understand that Sourceforge wants to reduce their huge bandwidth costs, and so does whatever they can to reduct demand. Good for them, bad for us. -- Rod http://www.sunsetsystems.com/ On Saturday 16 February 2002 10:11 am, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > I think it is great that sourceforge have turned this option off, > and take it as yet another reason to stay with sourceforge. > Automatic Reply-to has always annoyed me and none of the lists > I administer use it. > > Kind regards > Keld |
|
From: Kenneth G. <la...@th...> - 2002-02-17 02:34:05
|
i have found yahoogroups a very good list manager. you have a lot of options like blocking attachments and monitoring suspect posters. the downside is the irritating advertisements that come with it. but the ads are always at the end, so after a while you get trained to ignore it. since i found the reply-to-all feature, i hope everyone is enjoying getting two copies of each mail - frankly i prefer advertisements. kg ps yahoogroups also has a feature to import an already existing mailing list, so dieter would have the minimum of effort On Sunday 17 February 2002 00:07, Rod Roark wrote: > Well I feel it's close to a non-issue, as users always get to choose > where their mail goes. What the default reply-to does is "suggest" > where most replies should go. > > Since replies tend to be answers to questions, and of interest to more > than one person, I prefer the reply-to header. That way more good > stuff gets into the archives. > > Of course I understand that Sourceforge wants to reduce their huge > bandwidth costs, and so does whatever they can to reduct demand. > Good for them, bad for us. > > -- Rod > http://www.sunsetsystems.com/ > > On Saturday 16 February 2002 10:11 am, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > > I think it is great that sourceforge have turned this option off, > > and take it as yet another reason to stay with sourceforge. > > Automatic Reply-to has always annoyed me and none of the lists > > I administer use it. > > > > Kind regards > > Keld |
|
From: Kenneth G. <la...@th...> - 2002-02-17 02:33:49
|
and i got two copies of your mail kg On Saturday 16 February 2002 22:38, Wil Cooley wrote: > Also Sprach Kenneth Gonsalves <la...@th...> on Sat, Feb 16, 2002 > at 02:44:50AM PST > > > hi all > > i have been regularly posting to this list, but since i am a subscriber > > to several lists, i automatically delete any list message 'from' me > > without reading it. so i just discovered that none of my posts are coming > > to the list - they are all going to the individual to whom i am replying. > > personally i feel that when pressing the 'reply' button on a message in a > > list, the reply should go to the list - else it is a big headache, and i > > feel the list members are also losing in the sense that many replies to > > problems faced are not appearing on the list at all. could the list admin > > do something about this? > > Try the 'reply-to-all' button. > > Wil ---------------------------------------- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; charset="us-ascii"; name="Attachment: 1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: ---------------------------------------- |
|
From: Wil C. <wc...@na...> - 2002-02-17 02:37:47
|
Also Sprach Kenneth Gonsalves <la...@th...> on Sat, Feb 16, 2002= at 06:33:54PM PST > and i got two copies of your mail Yeah, but I get one in my list mailbox (because I filter on list-manager headers) and one in my inbox, so I know right away if you responded to me. I'm on 40 or 50 mailing lists and don't get around to reading to reading them before they expire; I prefer I get a copy in my inbox for threads I'm actively discussing on. Wil --=20 W. Reilly Cooley wc...@na... Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc irc.linux.com #orlug,#lnxs The public demands certainties; it must be told definitely and a bit raucously that this is true and that is false. But there are no certaintie= s. -- H.L. Mencken, "Prejudice" |
|
From: Kenneth G. <la...@th...> - 2002-02-17 07:50:27
|
sounds cool. what do you use to filter your mails? kg On Sunday 17 February 2002 08:07, Wil Cooley wrote: > Also Sprach Kenneth Gonsalves <la...@th...> on Sat, Feb 16, 2002 > at 06:33:54PM PST > > > and i got two copies of your mail > > Yeah, but I get one in my list mailbox (because I filter on > list-manager headers) and one in my inbox, so I know right away if > you responded to me. I'm on 40 or 50 mailing lists and don't get > around to reading to reading them before they expire; I prefer I > get a copy in my inbox for threads I'm actively discussing on. > > Wil |
|
From: Wil C. <wc...@na...> - 2002-02-17 17:56:09
|
Also Sprach Kenneth Gonsalves <la...@th...> on Sat, Feb 16, 2002= at 11:52:02PM PST > sounds cool. what do you use to filter your mails? Procmail. Most GUI mailers support filtering on their own too, like Netscape, Lookout, etc. Wil --=20 W. Reilly Cooley wc...@na... Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc irc.linux.com #orlug,#lnxs "There was a vague, unpleasant manginess about his appearence; he somehow seemed dirty, though a close glance showed him as carefully shaven as an actor, and clad in immaculate linen." -- H.L. Mencken, on the death of William Jennings Bryan |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X