From: Oscar A. V. <ov...@en...> - 2006-11-09 15:00:24
|
We are a small power generator that purchases fuel and converts it into electrical and heat energy for sale. I've looked at the manual's section on Inventory, and it doesn't seem like I can have a fuel inventory and periodically consume it to produce energy for immediate sale (can't be inventoried). That would seem like a Job Costing or WIP functionality that doesn't seem to be there in SQL-Ledger. Am I wrong? If I am right (i.e., I can't do what I want), I'd appreciate suggestions on how to account for my fuel inventory and my energy sales. Thanks in advance. --=20 Oscar A. Valdez Energ=EDa Borealis Ltda. de C.V. |
From: Dieter S. <dsi...@sq...> - 2006-11-09 19:42:00
|
You have to set up heat as an assembly and add fuel as a component so it will be recognized as COGS when you sell heat. -- Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.com Tel: (780) 472-8161 DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: (780) 478-5281 ============== On a clear disk you can seek forever ================ On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Oscar A. Valdez wrote: > We are a small power generator that purchases fuel and converts it into > electrical and heat energy for sale. > > I've looked at the manual's section on Inventory, and it doesn't seem > like I can have a fuel inventory and periodically consume it to produce > energy for immediate sale (can't be inventoried). That would seem like a > Job Costing or WIP functionality that doesn't seem to be there in > SQL-Ledger. > > Am I wrong? > > If I am right (i.e., I can't do what I want), I'd appreciate suggestions > on how to account for my fuel inventory and my energy sales. > > Thanks in advance. > |
From: Jeff V. <jv...@ch...> - 2006-11-10 03:49:39
|
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 09:00 -0600, Oscar A. Valdez wrote: > We are a small power generator that purchases fuel and converts it into > electrical and heat energy for sale. > > I've looked at the manual's section on Inventory, and it doesn't seem > like I can have a fuel inventory and periodically consume it to produce > energy for immediate sale (can't be inventoried). That would seem like a > Job Costing or WIP functionality that doesn't seem to be there in > SQL-Ledger. > > Am I wrong? > Just a thought from a layman. IANAA Fuel used in operations is an expense item. You may buy it, and have some quantity on hand, but it is consumed as overhead in the production of energy. It should not be treated as inventory for this purpose. Energy can be treated as a service, since it is not tangible inventory. It can be sold by the unit, similar to service hours, and cannot be stored. Invoicing goes to AR. Overhead (consumables, labor, etc.) OTOH, is an operating expense that should be treated as expended as soon as it is received/paid for. Its usage impacts profit and detracts from income revenues. It goes to AP then gets paid from income. > If I am right (i.e., I can't do what I want), I'd appreciate suggestions > on how to account for my fuel inventory and my energy sales. > > Thanks in advance. |
From: Oscar A. V. <ov...@en...> - 2006-11-10 04:12:41
|
El jue, 09-11-2006 a las 21:49 -0600, Jeff Vian escribi=F3: > On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 09:00 -0600, Oscar A. Valdez wrote: > > We are a small power generator that purchases fuel and converts it in= to > > electrical and heat energy for sale. > >=20 > > I've looked at the manual's section on Inventory, and it doesn't seem > > like I can have a fuel inventory and periodically consume it to produ= ce > > energy for immediate sale (can't be inventoried). That would seem lik= e a > > Job Costing or WIP functionality that doesn't seem to be there in > > SQL-Ledger. > >=20 > > Am I wrong? > >=20 > Just a thought from a layman. IANAA >=20 > Fuel used in operations is an expense item. You may buy it, and have > some quantity on hand, but it is consumed as overhead in the production > of energy. It should not be treated as inventory for this purpose. >=20 > Energy can be treated as a service, since it is not tangible inventory. > It can be sold by the unit, similar to service hours, and cannot be > stored. Invoicing goes to AR. But what we do is transform fuel into electricity and heat. It's an industrial transformation. So fuel is our raw material, and electricity and heat our end products. --=20 Oscar A. Valdez Energ=EDa Borealis Ltda. de C.V. |
From: Jeff V. <jv...@ch...> - 2006-11-10 12:59:15
|
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:12 -0600, Oscar A. Valdez wrote: > El jue, 09-11-2006 a las 21:49 -0600, Jeff Vian escribi=C3=B3: > > On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 09:00 -0600, Oscar A. Valdez wrote: > > > We are a small power generator that purchases fuel and converts it = into > > > electrical and heat energy for sale. > > >=20 > > > I've looked at the manual's section on Inventory, and it doesn't se= em > > > like I can have a fuel inventory and periodically consume it to pro= duce > > > energy for immediate sale (can't be inventoried). That would seem l= ike a > > > Job Costing or WIP functionality that doesn't seem to be there in > > > SQL-Ledger. > > >=20 > > > Am I wrong? > > >=20 > > Just a thought from a layman. IANAA > >=20 > > Fuel used in operations is an expense item. You may buy it, and have > > some quantity on hand, but it is consumed as overhead in the producti= on > > of energy. It should not be treated as inventory for this purpose. > >=20 > > Energy can be treated as a service, since it is not tangible inventor= y. > > It can be sold by the unit, similar to service hours, and cannot be > > stored. Invoicing goes to AR. >=20 > But what we do is transform fuel into electricity and heat. It's an > industrial transformation. So fuel is our raw material, and electricity > and heat our end products. |
From: Jeff V. <jv...@ch...> - 2006-11-10 13:08:40
|
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:12 -0600, Oscar A. Valdez wrote: > El jue, 09-11-2006 a las 21:49 -0600, Jeff Vian escribió: > > On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 09:00 -0600, Oscar A. Valdez wrote: > > > We are a small power generator that purchases fuel and converts it into > > > electrical and heat energy for sale. > > > > > > I've looked at the manual's section on Inventory, and it doesn't seem > > > like I can have a fuel inventory and periodically consume it to produce > > > energy for immediate sale (can't be inventoried). That would seem like a > > > Job Costing or WIP functionality that doesn't seem to be there in > > > SQL-Ledger. > > > > > > Am I wrong? > > > > > Just a thought from a layman. IANAA > > > > Fuel used in operations is an expense item. You may buy it, and have > > some quantity on hand, but it is consumed as overhead in the production > > of energy. It should not be treated as inventory for this purpose. > > > > Energy can be treated as a service, since it is not tangible inventory. > > It can be sold by the unit, similar to service hours, and cannot be > > stored. Invoicing goes to AR. > > But what we do is transform fuel into electricity and heat. It's an > industrial transformation. So fuel is our raw material, and electricity > and heat our end products. Deiter made the comment that it can be used as part of an assembly, which would be the units of energy produced and sold. As such, you buy it, it goes into inventory, and as you sell the energy/heat it gets consumed and the cost becomes part of the COGS. I have a slight problem with that in that energy is not physical and cannot be stocked even though the fuel is physical. However, the concept seems proper. Cost of fuel is part of the cost of producing the energy you sell. |
From: Michael H. <mh...@it...> - 2007-01-25 19:16:37
|
Speaking to this a little further, some of our products are =20 "whiteboxes", which are PCs assembled by us from components purchased =20= wholesale. Our assemblies include a line item for the typical total =20 shipping cost of the components and also a figure for the calculated =20 labor cost of purchasing, assembling, etc. In this case of course =20 we're going the other direction, taking an intangible and making it =20 part of a tangible. The problem I could see with flipping it around for your =20 scenario is that you may end up in a cycle of constantly adjusting =20 the figure to match reality since your production rate will never be =20 perfectly even so no matter what conversion factor you decide to use =20 you'll always be a few MW (or more!) high or low at the end of a =20 billing cycle. That said, I'm not sure that's really something that =20 can be handled by any accounting system except those specifically =20 designed for the power generating industry and those tend to run into =20= the hundreds of thousands of dollars! If you're in the United States though there is a group called =20 EPRI, (Electric Power Research Institute), which you may even be a =20 member of already, who probably won't have the answer specifically =20 but could probably point you in the right direction to see what your =20 accounting options are. Even if you're not in the US they might =20 still be able to help as they operate globally. Their website is: http://www.epri.com/ Thanks, Michael On Nov 10, 2006, at 5:03 AM, Jeff Vian wrote: > On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:12 -0600, Oscar A. Valdez wrote: >> El jue, 09-11-2006 a las 21:49 -0600, Jeff Vian escribi=F3: >>> On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 09:00 -0600, Oscar A. Valdez wrote: >>>> We are a small power generator that purchases fuel and converts =20 >>>> it into >>>> electrical and heat energy for sale. >>>> >>>> I've looked at the manual's section on Inventory, and it doesn't =20= >>>> seem >>>> like I can have a fuel inventory and periodically consume it to =20 >>>> produce >>>> energy for immediate sale (can't be inventoried). That would =20 >>>> seem like a >>>> Job Costing or WIP functionality that doesn't seem to be there in >>>> SQL-Ledger. >>>> >>>> Am I wrong? >>>> >>> Just a thought from a layman. IANAA >>> >>> Fuel used in operations is an expense item. You may buy it, and =20 >>> have >>> some quantity on hand, but it is consumed as overhead in the =20 >>> production >>> of energy. It should not be treated as inventory for this purpose. >>> >>> Energy can be treated as a service, since it is not tangible =20 >>> inventory. >>> It can be sold by the unit, similar to service hours, and cannot be >>> stored. Invoicing goes to AR. >> >> But what we do is transform fuel into electricity and heat. It's an >> industrial transformation. So fuel is our raw material, and =20 >> electricity >> and heat our end products. > > Deiter made the comment that it can be used as part of an assembly, > which would be the units of energy produced and sold. As such, you =20= > buy > it, it goes into inventory, and as you sell the energy/heat it gets > consumed and the cost becomes part of the COGS. > > I have a slight problem with that in that energy is not physical and > cannot be stocked even though the fuel is physical. However, the > concept seems proper. Cost of fuel is part of the cost of producing =20= > the > energy you sell. > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20= > --- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, =20 > security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your =20 > job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache =20 > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?=20 > cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users |
From: Paul T. <pt...@wa...> - 2007-01-26 17:03:59
|
Michael Hasse schreef: > Speaking to this a little further, some of our products are > "whiteboxes", which are PCs assembled by us from components purchased > wholesale. Our assemblies include a line item for the typical total > shipping cost of the components and also a figure for the calculated > labor cost of purchasing, assembling, etc. In this case of course > we're going the other direction, taking an intangible and making it > part of a tangible. > In those circumstances I strongly suggest you use a service item for the services and an inventory item for the goods. An assembly of goods and services should then give correct figures for hardware (inventory) and COGS one way. And as a bonus, revenue for services the other way.. |
From: Michael H. <mh...@it...> - 2007-01-30 17:19:09
|
I guess that wasn't very clear, was it? :) The service items for our whiteboxes are indeed service. The power generating problem is a bit tougher though because while service items are "soft", inventory items are not. So if one of my guys spends an extra fifteen minutes building a machine we can just absorb it and inventory is not affected. In the power generation case though the equation goes the other way, if one of his generators gets a leaky exhaust valve or something and nobody notices for awhile, it will subtly skew the output-power/ fuel ratio and he'll have burned more fuel per megawatt than usual which is a lot harder to "absorb" as he's paying actual money for that. He'll have to either constantly tweak the ratio in his billing or have a periodic adjustment entry, (which I guess is not so different from our update "invoices" when we take inventory and have to account for the misc cables and things that were never actually billed). Thanks, Michael On Jan 26, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Paul Tammes wrote: > Michael Hasse schreef: >> Speaking to this a little further, some of our products are >> "whiteboxes", which are PCs assembled by us from components purchased >> wholesale. Our assemblies include a line item for the typical total >> shipping cost of the components and also a figure for the calculated >> labor cost of purchasing, assembling, etc. In this case of course >> we're going the other direction, taking an intangible and making it >> part of a tangible. >> > In those circumstances I strongly suggest you use a service item > for the > services and an inventory item for the goods. > An assembly of goods and services should then give correct figures for > hardware (inventory) and COGS one way. > And as a bonus, revenue for services the other way.. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php? > page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users |