Re: [SL] latex dilemma & blank emails

[Dieter S. <dsi...@sq...>]

There is an upgrade file available for 1.8.3 which addresses the line
length for attachments. Apparently this fixed the problem Outlook was
having with decoding the attachments.


Dieter Simader    http://www.sql-ledger.org   (780) 472-8161
DWS Systems Inc.     Accounting Software       Fax: 478-5281
=========== On a clear disk you can seek forever ===========

On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, David Ratte wrote:

> This is NOT just an outlook problem, I've been complaining about this since 
> 1.8.3 came out and have not been able to figure it out myself.
> 
> I don't have any microsoft stuff in the building here and I can't read my own 
> emails using konqueror, netscape 4.75, or anything else!
> 
> I've checked the CPAN code Dieter used and can't find anything wrong with it. 
> The only difference is the maximum line length is a little shorter, but 
> changing it back to match the original does not fix the problem.
> 
> I still believe the CPAN code has an issue though, because if you look at the 
> raw output of sendmail as compared to other BASE64 documents generated by 
> other programs, documents from other programs have the code all line up in 
> neat little rows, where the CPAN code looks like a scrambled mess.
> 
> For the moment, all I was able to do to continue to function with my 
> customers, was to comment skip the base64 encoding routine (and send the 
> documents un-encoded)
> 
> But, meanwhile I have bigger fish to fry - currently I have a postgres ut-oh 
> such that my database is corrupt and after a re-index only contains 3 
> records, even though a look at the raw files shows much more... anyone know a 
> good postgres database recovery service?
> 
> -Dave Ratte
> Superior Circuit Technologies, Inc.
> dr...@su...