|
From: alta <al...@al...> - 2002-02-28 20:02:12
|
Paul ... Your inputs are always of value. In my case, I consider my writing of articles to be a part of the business. It's a form of advertising that even pays me some. So, I don't really consider it personal, and that's why I am running it through sql-ledger. ... Reed On Thursday 28 February 2002 11:31, you wrote: > # start offtopic > Sorry, forgot to post to the list as well.. > I quote one of my educators "A mailing-list is a concept set up to > help many instead of one: answers to questions put forward by one > are received by the questioner *and* the 'lurkers' on the list. > 'lurkers' that say 'hm...aha!' to themselves while reading the > emails on the list, while they themselves might not yet have > arrived at the question at hand or were not yet able to formulate > it correctly/completely. Anyway, answers in a mailing-list are more > help than privately emailed answers." so there you are.. > # end offtopic > > Reed, > > I am not specialized in tax- or general law outside holland.. But > in holland, even if you run a one-man company, it would be wise to > keep VERY strict track of personal income and expenses on the one > hand and of business income and expenses on the other. In case of > doubt (or no available 'accounting trail') the tax officers (IRS) > will pick whatever you have to pay most taxes on as being what > happened. Afterwards you are sure to have a heck of a time to proof > anything different, chances of success there are only technical. I > figure the IRS anywhere worldwide is likely to have a similar > approach ;-(( > > From an accounting standpoint the same applies, it is allways wise > to first analyse the actual situation and afterwards put it in any > form of accounting package / scheme. Thus the accounting scheme and > the actual 'real life' world are at least compatible. > > PS: Mixing 'pleasure' (personal) with business (company) is not a > good idea to begin with, and fiscally speaking it comes close to an > open check to the IRS.. However unpleasant, it is best to keep TWO > sets of books: one for the private household and one for the > company. Any payments one way or the other between those two > entities should be clearly discribed (advance on this years profit, > paid cash advance regarding office supplies, etcetera) and if > possible be backed up by at least a paper trail and receipts. > > Do not let it get you down, and if all else fails, call in a > bookkeeper or accountant ;-) > > Paul. > > -----Original Message----- > From: alta [mailto:sp...@al...] > Sent: woensdag 27 februari 2002 18:25 > To: sql...@li...; Dr Default > Subject: Re: Error when Adding a Service > > > > Paul ... > > Generally, I do not know exactly how much I will be paid for an > article until I receive the check, because the amount depends upon > the edited (final) size of the article and other factors. In other > words, I do not send an invoice -- I receive a check of surprise > value, and want a simple way to book the income. My company is a > one-person company (me). Originally, it seemed simple enough to > treat the process as a service. Your comments give me more to > think about. Thanks. > > ... Reed > > On Wednesday 27 February 2002 00:18, you wrote: > > Reed, > > > > I guess you might want to look at your 'WRITING' as another kind > > of 'ARTICLE'. Try to imagine selling an existing book that you > > yourself do not have in stock yet to a customer. > > You would have to first place an order for it, buy it and then > > get it in stock before you could sell it to the customer, issue a > > packing slip and get it out of the stock again. > > The same goes for your article: IF it is owned by the company > > because e.g. your contract says so, or you want the firm to have > > the rights for it, in fact the company is buying it from you AS A > > PERSON. YOU are the manufacurer of the 'goods'. SO the company > > should place an order, receive the article and then sell it to > > the highest bidder.. However, if you put it in the company like > > this future rights (for reprints or movies or whatever) will also > > be in the company. Hope this clarifies the 'There are no > > purchases invoved in the writing I do'.. > > > > If it is just to keep track of income, I suggest you think about > > this very carefully and maybe take it up with a tax advisor or > > bookkeeper. It could be simpler to use a SEPARATE BANK ACCOUNT > > and book any income > > > > from this kind to a separate ledger 'Private income from writing' > > and NOT send out bills on the companies behalf, for as I pointed > > out, it seems to me the company is selling something they have > > not yet purchased and thus have a negative stock of YOUR > > articles.. The difference between COG (cost of goods) and income > > stays in the company > > > > that way, not in your private account. IF ever a movie or book > > should follow, all income is for the company as well, so take > > that in mind when negotiating the price, or stipulate in the > > order confirmation that this transaction only exists for ONE > > publishment in XX magazine in year YY, and etcetera, you get the > > idea.. > > > > If the 'via company' route is (still) intended anyway, you should > > at least make official arrangements as to the fees due to the > > company for > > > > handling your affairs on the one hand (they would be a sort of > > literary agent or publisher, so probably a percentage, 10 to 15% > > I guess), and as to the amounts you AS A PERSON are to receive on > > the other hand. > > > > Once you have this clear in your mind, IF the company stays > > involved, the costs would be sale price minus xx%, the income > > would be sale price 100%, leaving YOU as a person in the form of > > A/P for the (100 - xx) part. > > > > Hope this helps, somehow I got the impression you are trying to > > solve a problem you might not want to or need to have.. > > > > Paul > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sql...@li... > > [mailto:sql...@li...] On Behalf > > Of alta Sent: dinsdag 26 februari 2002 6:13 > > To: Dieter Simader; sql...@li... > > Subject: Re: Error when Adding a Service > > > > > > > > Dieter ... > > > > I think I should explain what I am doing in more detail. Mostly, > > I sell books. All that is working fine. Occasionally, I write > > articles > > > > for magazines. When they pay me, I presume that I should enter > > dollars received in a "service" account. So I tried to setup a > > service called "Writing" which is tied to the existing > > "4310--Writing account. (The Add Service form caused the error.) > > > > Upon further investigation, I find that the "Writing" service WAS > > added. (Actually 3 were added because I tried 3 times.) Each > > time I attempted to add "Writing" a server error displayed, and > > the error_log > > > > showed: > > > > [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Premature end of script headers: > > /usr/local/sql-ledger/ic.pl > > > > So, I guess it worked, after all. However, the reason for the > > error is still a curiosity. > > > > Answers to your questions follow: > > > You don't have an account number for purchases. > > > > I puzzling as to why having an account number for purchases would > > have anything to do with a "Writing" service that I provide. For > > the "Writing" service, there are no purchases needed, but I guess > > a default needs to be selected in the Add Service form. I > > selected "5010--Purchases", which is flagged with IC_expense. > > > > > check that you have at least one account flagged with > > > IC_expense. "Setup" -> "List Accounts" > > > > The following accounts are flagged with IC_Expense: > > 5010--Purchases > > 5100--Freight > > 5781--Internet > > > > > Also go into your preferences and see which account comes up > > > for the 'Expense Account' > > > > From my preferences, Expense Account: 5040--COGS / Books > > > > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, alta wrote: > > > > I get the following error posted to the server log when I > > > > attempt to > > > > > > > > add a service: > > > > > > > > [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Premature end of script headers: > > > > /usr/local/sql-ledger/ic.pl > > > > > > > > Has anyone else seen this problem? > > > > > > > > The details... > > > > > > > > I am attempting to add a service called "Writing": > > > > > > > > Number: Writing > > > > Description: Writing > > > > Unit of measure: hr > > > > List Price: 0 > > > > Sell Price: 0 > > > > Income: 4310--Writing > > > > Expense--Purchases > > > > 2310--GST: not checked > > > > 2311--PST: not checked > > > > > > > > My setup for "4310--Writing": > > > > > > > > Account Number: 4310 > > > > Description: Writing > > > > Account Type: Income, Account > > > > Is this a summary account to record: no, no, no > > > > Include in drop-down lists: > > > > Receivables: Income > > > > Service Items: Income > > > > Include this account...as taxable? no > > > > > > > > > > > > Your help appreciated ... Reed -- Reed White - ALTA RESEARCH - www.alta-research.com Phone: 877-360-2582 - Email: al...@al... |