|
From: kevin b. <kev...@bi...> - 2002-02-16 18:43:18
|
hi there, in the meantime maybe there could be a regular monthly reminder to tell people to hit the 'reply-all' button? i'm not sure what sourceforge are playing at - surely its better for these crucial lists to work properly than follow some obscure etiquette? kev bailey Dieter Simader wrote: > Sourceforge has turned off the Reply-To list feature because apparently it > is not proper email etiquette to force a reply-to. I too, on the other > hand, feel that everyone on the list looses because a lot of the members > on the list reply directly rather than to the list. This is evident when > you look at the question/answer ratio. > > If someone has a suggestion of moving the list to another server please > let me know and I'll move it. It's a great deal of work for me but I think > it is worthwhile in the long run. > > I am not all that happy with how Sourceforge is handling various issues, > including this tiny tidbit with the mailing lists. > > > Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 > DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 > =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > > >>hi all >>i have been regularly posting to this list, but since i am a subscriber to >>several lists, i automatically delete any list message 'from' me without >>reading it. so i just discovered that none of my posts are coming to the list >>- they are all going to the individual to whom i am replying. personally i >>feel that when pressing the 'reply' button on a message in a list, the reply >>should go to the list - else it is a big headache, and i feel the list >>members are also losing in the sense that many replies to problems faced are >>not appearing on the list at all. could the list admin do something about >>this? >>kg >> >> >> > > > > |