|
From: David A. B. <da...@pa...> - 2002-01-01 22:23:53
|
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 13:56:43 -0700 (MST) Dieter Simader <dsi...@sq...> spewed into the bitstream: > David! > > Before making any false statements read the documentation, see the FAQ for > a solution about audit control. Apologies. But it does come "out of the box" with delete buttons on accounts that shouldn't have them (at least according to my accountant). While I will look at the FAQ, I did read the documentation. I probably missed something (won't be the first time). Can the delete buttons be removed? If this is in the FAQ, sorry. Suggestion: a GAAP checkbox that changes the "Delete" buttons to "Reverse Entry" buttons and creates the reverse automagically. I'll shut up now. > > > Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 > DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 > =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== > > On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, David A. Bandel wrote: > > > On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 04:31:16 -0800 (PST) > > Caffeinate The World <moc...@ya...> spewed into the bitstream: > > > > Apart from adding "me too" (Tm AOLusers), I'd like to add that the only > > "problem" I see with using SQL-Ledger, at least for US businesses, is that > > you can delete transactions. I don't know about Canada, but at least in > > the US, GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Practice) is (or at least was) > > that you don't delete transactions, you create reversing entries. I will > > admit, it's been a long time since I looked at GAAP, so apart from that I > > have no idea how far from accepted practice SQL-Ledger strays. > > Fortunately, my accountant is just happy I'm using something other than a > > shoe box with receipts thrown in it. > > > > Ciao, > > > > David A. Bandel > > > David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. -- Nemesis Racing Team motto Internet (H323) phone: 206.28.187.30 |