|
From: Ned L. <ne...@ma...> - 2001-12-18 21:59:14
|
This is coming in 1.8 isn't it? Dieter, are you going to give us all a Christmas present? :) Ned On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 aer...@te... wrote: > Yep, splits and the ability to handle partial payments would make it useable > to me. > > > >Hi > > > >The only reason why I am not using sql-ledger is the lack of split > >booking (I hope this is the correct expression), i.e. the possibility of > >recording different positions of one invoice in different accounts. > > > >Example: > > > >Our company buys 4 harddrives. 3 are for resale, one is to be used by > >ourselves. Consequently the 3 disks have to be recorded as > >merchandise/trading goods, the other one as computing equipment (or the > >like) and should not show up in inventory. > > > >Another Example: > > > >Our company bills a customer. There are two positions: we sold her a HDD > >and charged her for some services (eg. support). Again both items have > >to be recorded in different accounts. > > > >I cannot see how this can be done with sql-ledger at the moment. If this > >feature could be implemented in the future, this would make sql-ledger > >even better :) > > > >Any comments? > > > >regards, > >ralph > > > > > > > > > |