|
From: Dieter S. <dsi...@sq...> - 2001-08-09 16:52:33
|
The only ORDER BY which doesn't work in 7.1 is the one in a UNION. The rest work as expected. Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Federico Sevilla III wrote: > On Mon, 6 Aug 2001 at 09:33, Dieter Simader wrote: > > There are a few more of this type of statement in IR, IS and RP.pm > > I noticed. I didn't change any of them, though (except the one that > generates the trial balance) because I am not confident with the code > (yet). > > > The code works on PostgreSQL 7.0 Looks like 7.1 is a bit more picky > > and doesn't like table identifiers. It's logical though, there can > > only be one column with one name so the table identifier is redundant, > > BUT, ....... > > You lost me. But? What problems do you foresee if we change all "ORDER BY > chart.accno" to "ORDER BY accno"? I have not run SQL Ledger in a > production environment yet: we're still evaluating it and will hopefully > migrate soon. So I am not familiar with the system yet. Not enough to know > what changes will open pandora's box, and what will open the gates of > heaven. ;> > > --> Jijo > > -- > Federico Sevilla III :: ji...@le... > Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection, Inc. > GnuPG Key: <http://www.leathercollection.ph/jijo.gpg> > > > |