|
From: Federico S. I. <ji...@le...> - 2001-08-08 17:20:54
|
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001 at 09:33, Dieter Simader wrote: > There are a few more of this type of statement in IR, IS and RP.pm I noticed. I didn't change any of them, though (except the one that generates the trial balance) because I am not confident with the code (yet). > The code works on PostgreSQL 7.0 Looks like 7.1 is a bit more picky > and doesn't like table identifiers. It's logical though, there can > only be one column with one name so the table identifier is redundant, > BUT, ....... You lost me. But? What problems do you foresee if we change all "ORDER BY chart.accno" to "ORDER BY accno"? I have not run SQL Ledger in a production environment yet: we're still evaluating it and will hopefully migrate soon. So I am not familiar with the system yet. Not enough to know what changes will open pandora's box, and what will open the gates of heaven. ;> --> Jijo -- Federico Sevilla III :: ji...@le... Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection, Inc. GnuPG Key: <http://www.leathercollection.ph/jijo.gpg> |