From: Wayne <inf...@pi...> - 2001-07-12 18:06:54
|
Thanks for all the replys. After doing further reading I came to the conculsion that I didn't need mod_perl. I have Apache now installed. now for DBI. Wayne "Roderick A. Anderson" wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Wayne wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the input John. I download Apache 1.3.20 and after reading > > > the INSTALL instruction I'm not sure whether I should install mod_perl > > > first or if I can do it after installing Apache. > > You might look for the apache-heavy package - statically linked in > mod_perl (and other modules if you want). There are RPMs (which is what > I use) but I'm not sure about a tarball or other package managers. > > > Forget about mod_perl. For SQL-Ledger you need Apache and perl, not > > apache+perl. > > > > mod_perl is for embedding perl commands in html - like server side > > includes or php. SQL-Ledger is perl CGI-scripts, not embedded perl. > > Actually I think you're thinking of embperl. Mod_perl loads a perl > interpreter into Apache. The main benefit being quicker startup of perl > scripts. Instead of Apache making a system call to the script which > starts perl which reads the rest of the script file to execute; mod_perl > gets reads the script to execute (or it will already be there from a > previous call). Things happen faster. > > For a lightly loaded server (hardware and software wise) it isn't > really needed but on a system running multiple companies which may have > multiple users connected at the same time the response times would be > much better. > > I'm not sure if the SQL-Ledger code supports Apache::DBI but it is my > understanding that this in conjunction with mod_perl will make a > significant response time difference. > > The short of it is mod_perl isn't needed for light/normal usage. > > Rod > -- > Remove the word 'try' from your vocabulary ... > Don't try. Do it or don't do it ... > Steers try! > > Don Aslett |