From: Thomas S. <ps...@on...> - 2001-02-08 18:18:11
|
Surly we want to comply, as best we can with International Accounting Standards and Generally Accepted Accouting Principles. But various standards committies have varying standards, yet most of these standards are about Human Practice rather then to how an accounting program works. SQL-Ledger has an A/R, A/P and a G/L, does Income Statements and Balance Sheets, with those in place its pretty much up to you to follow standards. But like I said, if SQL-Ledger can be improved to help facilitate standard practices then we should do so. -- Thomas Sawyer ps...@on... - email ---- Andre Felipe Machado <and...@te...> wrote: > Hello, > As I am a newbie at this, what is the positioning, or compliance of > > sql-ledger to COMPASS General Ledger Facility specification ( > http://www.compassgl.org/newhometest/990305fr1.html , see > www.compassgl.org ) and the more international broad one International > > Accounting Standards Committee ® (http://www.iasc.org.uk/frame/cen2.htm > > ) see www.iasc.org.uk ? > I realized that www.compassgl.org is a subset and computational focused > team from www.iasc.org.uk. Is it right? > Maybe these are irrelevant questions, but it "seems" that compliance > will > allow fully integration with other sw (crm, hr, pos, etc, etc) and > or > attract more and more developers to help. The www.gnuenterprise.org > is a > bold attempt (pre alpha stage now) to create a big enterprise package, > > and MAYBE sql-ledger could integrate well with it. > Please, some patience with these questions, as I am a newbie..... > Thanks. > Andre Felipe Machado > PS: if I can remember some people is starting a documentation effort. > Why > not use sourceforge resources for documentation at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sql-ledger ? > > > __________________________________________________ FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place. Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com |