From: Thomas S. <ps...@on...> - 2001-02-06 19:36:03
|
I think Dieter might have meant "in implementation". Paging would certainly be a acceptable and sometimes useful feature, but it may not be so easy to code. I'd rather see an effective compromise for now and get the new version out rather then wait for the inventory search code to be completly re-written. -- Thomas Sawyer ps...@on... - email (303) 285-3487 x1594 - voicemail/fax ---- Matt Benjamin <ma...@li...> wrote: > > Why not, exactly? It seems like a sensible approach when you really > do > want to browse many pages of data. That must be why even the most > recent > search engines provide this feature. > > I certainly wouldn't substitute paging for search criteria, but again, > sometimes you want to browse. > > Matt > > > Slicing output into pages does not work very well. > > > > > __________________________________________________ FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place. Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com |