From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-14 00:14:28
|
I would say previews is a much better word. Look at products like RedHat, Zimbra, KnowledgeTree, Hyperic, Compiere, SugarCRM, Funambol etc etc etc. All of them have an OSS suite which is fully functional, powerful enough to get a good feel for what the products really do, and are actually sufficient for a certain percentage of users. The add-ons, however, are compelling enough for the folks with a budget to go ahead and pay for the full version. Dieter does that to some extent through the manual and support packages, and some OSS companies are able to make do that way, but it's a marginal existence at best. The non-OSS module approach appears to be the most successful business model so far, (anomalies like Mozilla not withstanding! :). Thanks, Michael On Jul 13, 2009, at 2:41 PM, sql...@li... wrote: I would have to disagree there, I like that business model. I used Open Office and liked it and when I needed more functionality I was happy to purchase Star Office. The same was true of PGAdmin III and several other apps I use on a daily basis. I loaded SQL and played with it enough to know it would suite my needs so I bought the manual and a years subscription. If I upgrade I will pay for another year and get a new manual but for now 2.6.22 is working just fine and I'm not one of those patch happy people that need to have the latest version fully updated. I think of them as previews not teasers. Jeff Roberts sql...@li... wrote: > And those companies that use OSS as a 'teaser', arent playing by > the spirit, > and personally id never do business with them. > > On Monday 13 July 2009 04:19:17 pm sql-ledger- > us...@li... > wrote: > >> This is why most of the larger OSS companies have a free and open- >> sourced version which has enough bells and whistles to be interesting >> but they hold back some modules that their actual target market would >> require in production. (The source for these modules is usually >> still available as well but for paid subscribers only and obviously >> not re-distributable!) >> They really get the best of both worlds this way with OSS >> developers on the "team" often contributing to the non-OSS modules as >> well. There have been a few cases where specific non-OSS modules >> were recreated by external OSS developers, (a good example is >> Zimbra's backup function or some of KnowledgeTree's document >> importing tools), but for the most part it's a model that works very >> well. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Michael >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ sql-ledger-users mailing list sql...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users |