|
From: Hamish B. <hw...@be...> - 2009-05-15 23:14:59
|
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Dieter Simader wrote: > On Fri, 15 May 2009, Hamish Bain wrote: > > On Fri, 15 May 2009, Dieter Simader wrote: > >> Before applying a patch users should investigate why these transactions > >> show up. If it is a bug it will be fixed but if it is simply a user > >> error, well, then fix up your own f'up. > > > > It would be interesting to know why you didn't reply to me on your Forum, > > as a 'paid-up' member of SQL-Ledger since I started using it 3-4 years > > ago, and tell me I screwed up, and to fix my own f'up. Or else at least > > make some attempt to see if it might be a bug? > > > Why should I hunt for a bug, just because you don't get it? > > I replied to your request with a detailed explaination of what you have to > do. Not true. We have had no communication re Reconciliation either privately, on the Forum, or on this list. In my Forum enquiry I cut & pasted your instructions to 'tdiehl' of 09/04/07 to show you that 1) I had the same problem as 'tdiehl' and 2) I had made every effort to follow your instruction to fix this problem. Maybe you're confusing me with 'thdiehl'? > What more do you need? At the very least perhaps you could post to the privacy of the Forum the quick private email explanation that seems to have satisfied je...@ix...? Like Jeff I am familiar with the concept of 'Reconciliation', having used Paxton's Business Desk in the 1980's (cobol!) and then Quicken and MYOB before SQL-Ledger, but there is obviously some extra 'concept' in SQL-Ledger which is escaping me. Hamish -- Sent via KMail 1.9.7, Gentoo 1.12.11.1, Linux-2.6.22-gentoo-r8 |