From: Bernd P. <bp...@ch...> - 2008-06-12 23:24:20
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 07:21:19 +0500 >From: "Armaghan Saqib" <sa...@le...> >Subject: Re: [SL] Trend analysis - additional development >To: sql...@li... >Message-ID: > <30d...@ma...> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >I think things are not as simple. If someone is going to put $20k-40k >in some software he also needs to consider (among other things): >1. Which project is open to criticism and critical discussions. >2. Number of core developers behind it. >3. Core architecture. >4. Community and number of other contributors. >and so on. Allow me to disagree. $20k-40k is not a vast amount of money in commercial development. Companies around the world a paying contractors a lot of money to develop whatever software they need. This is controlled by specifications, quality tests and sign-off of the work. The ordering party gets the source code, test protocols, documentation - - whatever has been agreed upon and that's it. I don't see any relation to your points 1. - 4. at all. If we are talking about SQL-Ledger you may want to feed that development into the main system because this would make it available for other people and for future versions but that is not a requirement. Regards, Bernd - -- プラゲ ベェアント - Bernd Plagge ファースト・チョイス・インターネット(有) First Choice Internet Ltd., Tokyo Tel. 03-4500-7799 Fax. 03-4400-3723 mail: bp...@ch... url: http://www.choicenet.ne.jp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIUa+DpYU8M8PbPV4RAm+gAKDDyBcOtEG+G4wVdeeJaJAlndzkawCgoctP CPmrnxR2h1KMXCc+qyzRkuw= =AAfe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |