From: Luke <sl...@li...> - 2008-06-10 08:53:34
|
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, la...@cl... wrote: > I don't think I was trying to define what the role of a DBA or business > anaylst should be as I do believe in cross training. I think I named a > legitimate reason why going to a postgres only solution isn't the greatest It is a "legitimate reason"--I was not claiming otherwise. However, imo it is a legitimate reason for the minority of potential users, not the majority. Look at Quickbooks, for example: their database is completely proprietary from a user prospective. Any organization using that, has *no* outside access to the database, DBA or no DBA, and how many substantial organizations are using it? Enough to keep Intuit in business, bad practices and all. > idea for the open source except for Commad Prompt. Hey, it's their open > source and they are free to take LSMB to Command Prompt Financial. I stand > netural between SL an LSMB but I sure hope that no one is buying > statements that SL is terrible because it does not use relationships or > referential integrity constraints Although.... > million dollor financial system that is just that and works very well for > its clients. Nonetheless, you know the bottom line is that the software > has to work--and that's SL for now. I don't think that this point is particularly in dispute. What is, is that LSMB, with its deep integration and exclusivity with PostGreSQL, is either a potentially good, or potentially bad, option for the future, if they get it to a widely usable and stable setup. I maintain, taking QuickBooks as an example, that as long as the financial side is properly functional, and the UI suits the needs of the organization, the backend database is not something that the vast (and I do mean vast) majority of potential users is going to care about. Keep in mind its intended market--it's right there in the name: small to medium businesses. We aren't talking about huge companies with seas of financial analysts, DBAs, reports departments, and the like. We are probably talking about companies with one to a thousand employees. Luke |