Re: [SL] upgrade issues...

[Armaghan S. <sa...@le...>]

Roy W Pennington wrote:
> isn't in the doc for UPGRADE-2.6.27-2.8.0
> but it is in the docs UPGRADE-2.8.0-2.8.2, UPGRADE-2.8.2-2.8.4  etc
>
> There is no doc named "UPGRADE-2.6.27-2.8.12"....  is that an oversight ?
> or is it recommended to upgrade to 2.8. then incrementally to 2.8.12 ? 
Yes, the incremental upgrade is the recommended (and the only) way and 
seems logical because every upgrade script is written whenever a new 
(incremental) release comes out.

Armaghan

-- 
Purpose-built SQL-Ledger Hosting
http://www.ledger123.com/

Free trial available.
--