From: Adam V. M. <amv...@gm...> - 2007-03-12 19:37:52
|
I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2.8 (and one prototype laptop that would only run 2.2.2) and I would also agree that it's a great choice for running SL. (Our install is running on 6.1->6.2) I would however add the there is no reason not to use the package's instead of building from ports. You'll save loads of time, and the packages are already optimized plus you'll make it easier on FreeBSD's bandwidth as there isn't as much to d/l(if something comes up down the road you can always change it later). And as already noted, use either package or the ports tree, not both. If you're really insistent on having a GUI check out www.pcbsd.org - FBSD + KDE I've beening using it to install desktop workstations, but the project has commercial backing and a server option during the install plus the pbi collection allows for clickable installers for common apps eg apache, open office, etc. Of course it comes with it's own standard quirks, but they're easy to overcome if you're familiar w/ FBSD. |