From: Michael H. <mh...@it...> - 2007-01-25 19:16:37
|
Speaking to this a little further, some of our products are =20 "whiteboxes", which are PCs assembled by us from components purchased =20= wholesale. Our assemblies include a line item for the typical total =20 shipping cost of the components and also a figure for the calculated =20 labor cost of purchasing, assembling, etc. In this case of course =20 we're going the other direction, taking an intangible and making it =20 part of a tangible. The problem I could see with flipping it around for your =20 scenario is that you may end up in a cycle of constantly adjusting =20 the figure to match reality since your production rate will never be =20 perfectly even so no matter what conversion factor you decide to use =20 you'll always be a few MW (or more!) high or low at the end of a =20 billing cycle. That said, I'm not sure that's really something that =20 can be handled by any accounting system except those specifically =20 designed for the power generating industry and those tend to run into =20= the hundreds of thousands of dollars! If you're in the United States though there is a group called =20 EPRI, (Electric Power Research Institute), which you may even be a =20 member of already, who probably won't have the answer specifically =20 but could probably point you in the right direction to see what your =20 accounting options are. Even if you're not in the US they might =20 still be able to help as they operate globally. Their website is: http://www.epri.com/ Thanks, Michael On Nov 10, 2006, at 5:03 AM, Jeff Vian wrote: > On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:12 -0600, Oscar A. Valdez wrote: >> El jue, 09-11-2006 a las 21:49 -0600, Jeff Vian escribi=F3: >>> On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 09:00 -0600, Oscar A. Valdez wrote: >>>> We are a small power generator that purchases fuel and converts =20 >>>> it into >>>> electrical and heat energy for sale. >>>> >>>> I've looked at the manual's section on Inventory, and it doesn't =20= >>>> seem >>>> like I can have a fuel inventory and periodically consume it to =20 >>>> produce >>>> energy for immediate sale (can't be inventoried). That would =20 >>>> seem like a >>>> Job Costing or WIP functionality that doesn't seem to be there in >>>> SQL-Ledger. >>>> >>>> Am I wrong? >>>> >>> Just a thought from a layman. IANAA >>> >>> Fuel used in operations is an expense item. You may buy it, and =20 >>> have >>> some quantity on hand, but it is consumed as overhead in the =20 >>> production >>> of energy. It should not be treated as inventory for this purpose. >>> >>> Energy can be treated as a service, since it is not tangible =20 >>> inventory. >>> It can be sold by the unit, similar to service hours, and cannot be >>> stored. Invoicing goes to AR. >> >> But what we do is transform fuel into electricity and heat. It's an >> industrial transformation. So fuel is our raw material, and =20 >> electricity >> and heat our end products. > > Deiter made the comment that it can be used as part of an assembly, > which would be the units of energy produced and sold. As such, you =20= > buy > it, it goes into inventory, and as you sell the energy/heat it gets > consumed and the cost becomes part of the COGS. > > I have a slight problem with that in that energy is not physical and > cannot be stocked even though the fuel is physical. However, the > concept seems proper. Cost of fuel is part of the cost of producing =20= > the > energy you sell. > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20= > --- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, =20 > security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your =20 > job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache =20 > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?=20 > cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users |