From: Wallace R. C. <wrc...@gm...> - 2006-12-08 16:12:21
|
On 12/8/06, Paul Witt <pau...@ox...> wrote: ... > Scenario: A credit card company has sent a statement, with a "minimum > payment" amount and a "must be received by" date. Since no interest > is currently being being charged by that card company, the intention is > to pay them the minimum payment from a bank account a week before the > "must be received by" date. The credit card account exists under "long > term liabilities" and the bank account exists under "current assets". > > What I actually end up doing in this situation is creating a general > ledger entry showing a credit to the bank account and a debit to the credit > card account for the same amount. This basically represents the transfer > that has taken place, but it doesn't record anything about the statement > / request for payment that was sent out. In a way their statement is > a bit like an invoice in that they're asking for payment, but it's not > really an invoice because it's not for goods or services; from my point > of view it's an internal transfer between an asset account and a liability > account. Actually, the statement that they (the credit card company, usually a bank) sent to you is a record of all the goods / services that you purchased on your credit card; an invoice, if you will. So, if you set it up as an invoice, I think the accounting will work just fine. > Before I witter on too much, I suppose the question is: in this situation, > is there a better way of representing the payment than via a GL entry? See above. -- Best Regards, Wallace |