From: GeorgeOsvald <geo...@ya...> - 2006-09-10 07:15:38
|
On Sunday 10 September 2006 16:25, Christopher Murtagh wrote: > This does not have to be a us VS them issue, but you seem to insist > on making it that, which is a real shame. I am simply trying to end this discussion about LedgerSMB ON THIS LIST. You guys have been busy lately on blogs, mail lists, postgres forums promoting your spoon (fork - and yes it is a joke - I do not like that word) which is fine there. You should however have the decency not to do that on this list. You say you do not care what benefits Dieter and what doesn't. Well neither do I but I also am naive enough to believe in fair play and promoting your fork on this list looks a lot like back stabbing to me. If this was any other forum not SQL-LEDGER user list than I would not have a problem with that. You say you only want to provide better service for your customers. By posting advertising of LedgerSMB you give me the impression that all you're trying to do is to steel as many customers as possible from this list to yours. Actually if you were up-front about it and simply said: "Hey guys blow this mob. Come to my list. My software/service is better." I would have less of a problem. In conclusion I must say only future will show what happens. I have been using SL for about 4 years now. More than a half as a paying customer. I have seen forks come and go. I have seen on-line services based on SL come and go. We will see what happens with your software. Changing accounting software is like changing a dentist. I would not be too keen to do either. |