From: GeorgeOsvald <geo...@ya...> - 2006-09-08 05:57:26
|
On Friday 08 September 2006 09:55, Josh Berkus wrote: > George, > > > I am not saying they are naive if they trusted Dieter. What I say is > > that there is a lot more to security then just the application itself. > > Anyone who just slaps anything on a web server without any additional > > precautions is naive. Dieter does behave strangely sometimes I admit but > > he can not be held responsible for every one who just blindely installs > > SL and then hopes for the best. I understand that there is a problem, my > > point is though that if your server is safe there is no way anyone from > > outside (not an employee) can do anything if your setup is half sane. > > Well, security is something you implement at every level, not just at the > gateway. So: SSL: yes, Domain limits: Yes, server lockdown: yes, strong > passwords: yes, secure session tracking: yes, database security: yes, > database auditing: yes. What you *don't* do is implement security in one > area (like SSL or VPN) and expect that you don't need to worry about > security anywhere else. That's a fast way to get hacked. You can do bit more than that depending on your level of paranoia. I am extremely paranoid. When it comes to security redundancy is a good thing. > Also, I'll tell you as someone who occasionally used to do database > forensics professionally, 90% of hacks against a financial application > happen from *inside* your organization. The most likely reason for > someone to hack SL is to commit malfeasance which is almost always going > to be an employee. So the fact that SL (or whatever) "isn't on the web" > isn't a security policy. When it comes to employee honesty there is nothing you can do. I know people who keep there passwords in their wallets just to remember. Dishonest person could take that password and access SL normally. Frankly If I had an employee who would be able to hack SL he/she would not be working as an accountant. You can still search the logs to find out who was logged in and did what. |