From: Dr E. L. <el...@li...> - 2006-09-08 05:14:38
|
on 9/7/06 9:59 PM Ed W said the following: > Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote: >> Where the f***k is the evidence about censoring, not that looking at the >> headers it is even remotely possible, and not that sourceforge would >> stand for it. Other than you forging the headers, perhaps, again. >> >> There has never anyone been banned, in particularily not for content, >> your truly is an example of what they have put up with, and subscription >> to this list is an automated process. >> > > I don't know if it's deliberate or not, but I have posted a fair number > of questions to this list which have simply not shown up? This is the most extraordinary rationale I have read in a long while. And, if you don' know, don't tell. > I don't have this problem with other Yahoo lists. I had assumed that > this list was somewhat moderated and perhaps my posts were being > disregarded... Not sure what moderator controls there are with Yahoo? > Didn't think that anything I had previously posted was controversial, > but perhaps...? The list is on SourceForge. Maybe you sent your questions to Yahoo :-)-O? As I said before, at the headers of your own email, the only delay is at sourceforge when the message is passed to the outbound quque, which given that they run gazillions of lists is instantaneous. Received: from lists-outbound.sourceforge.net (lists-outbound.sourceforge.net [66.35.250.225]) by linux.lisse.NA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F94B82F5 for <el...@ac...>; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:24:33 +0200 (WAST) Received: from sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net (unknown [10.3.1.93]) by sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEECFF13; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GLQ2I-0001ua-0u for sql...@li...; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 12:59:42 -0700 Received: from mail.wildgooses.com ([81.6.236.5]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1GLQ2G-0001WE-Hy for sql...@li...; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 12:59:42 -0700 [...] Received: from [127.0.0.1] (compaq.wildgooses.com [192.168.105.251]) by mail.wildgooses.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240AA33EEB for <sql...@li...>; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:59:14 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <450...@wi...> Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 20:59:06 +0100 From: Ed W <li...@wi...> In-Reply-To: <44F...@li...> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wildgooses.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:22:32 -0700 Subject: Re: [SL] SQL-Ledger vulnerability CVE-2006-4244 X-BeenThere: sql...@li... X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 [...] X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=0.13.7.2 To even *THINK* that it was technically possible, or sourceforge would permit to censor a(n unmoderated) list defies comprehension. No, actually, it doesn't. The Wannabe *KNOWS* he is not censored. He is, after all, a Wannabe-Security-Expert now, since he can forge headers. But why are they doing all of this. Ulterior motives come to mind. el -- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el...@li... el108-ARIN / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Please send DNS/NA-NiC related e-mail Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/ to dns...@na... |