Re: [SL] SQL-Ledger vulnerability CVE-2006-4244

[Chris C. <cc...@sp...>]

I have also had Email not show up on this list.

The best of all worlds would be for the developers to work together.   
There is more to this than meets the eye.  I don't necessarily fully  
believe that the SL developer is all bad, but I do feel that this  
product is a very closed OS product.  As others have said, join or  
fork.  It's all good as far as I'm concerned.  If the fork improves  
the product, then all the better.

 From my own perspective, I sent in money for support and the  
manual.  I got the manual, but I have not been satisfied with the  
support I have received, so I just stopped requesting it.  I have  
been happy (in the past) with paid support I have received from Chris  
Travers.  If I was to criticize Chris, it's that he is not available  
for me as much as I wished.

At the same time, Deiter's product has served me well and I thank him  
for that.  I will continue to use the SL product, and I will also  
watch the fork closely, and possibly switch if that is in my best  
interest.

In the big picture, debate is something that is good.  In the US,  
open public debate has been all but squashed for the last few years,  
and many have paid with their lives for the lack of it.  Like forking  
in OS, we have elections to correct the complete loss of  
accountability, honesty, credibility, and integrity many of us have  
had to live through these last few years.

Let the debate continue.  It's healthy, but sometimes uncomfortable!

Chris Curtis
Non racist, non sexist, pro-choice, and like my favorite person  
(jesus), a liberal!



On Sep 7, 2006, at 4:09 PM, GeorgeOsvald wrote:

> On Friday 08 September 2006 05:59, Ed W wrote:
>> Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
>>> Where the f***k is the evidence about censoring, not that looking  
>>> at the
>>> headers it is even remotely possible, and not that sourceforge would
>>> stand for it. Other than you forging the headers, perhaps, again.
>>>
>>> There has never anyone been banned, in particularily not for  
>>> content,
>>> your truly is an example of what they have put up with, and  
>>> subscription
>>> to this list is an automated process.
>>
>> I don't know if it's deliberate or not, but I have posted a fair  
>> number
>> of questions to this list which have simply not shown up?
>>
>> I don't have this problem with other Yahoo lists.  I had assumed that
>> this list was somewhat moderated and perhaps my posts were being
>> disregarded...  Not sure what moderator controls there are with  
>> Yahoo?
>> Didn't think that anything I had previously posted was controversial,
>> but perhaps...?
>
> My current user name is the third one that I am using for this  
> list. I was
> banned on this list once and had to use a different username to  
> gain access
> again. You want proof? I could give you my other two user names off  
> the list
> if I could be bothered. It is still possible to search for those in  
> the
> archives.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,  
> security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your  
> job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache  
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? 
> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> sql-ledger-users mailing list
> sql...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users