Re: [SL] Payroll

[Jeff V. <jv...@ch...>]

On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 18:07, Michael Richardson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> 
> >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Travers <ch...@ve...> writes:
>     Chris> I think that the paycheck database schema I have written
>     Chris> should be flexible enough to work in a wide variety of
>     Chris> circumstances and environments.  this would also be useful if
>     Chris> you need to print the check with the paycheck stub.
> 
>   It would be nice to have all the deductions on the stub :-)
> 
>     Chris> However, aside from that, I think that your approach is
>     Chris> fairly similar to the one I am advocating.  I think one of
>     Chris> the questions is how to make a flexible framework which can
>     Chris> deductions for multiple countries simultaneously even (if
>     Chris> necessary).  Perhaps if we all get started and exchange
>     Chris> ideas, this will happen.
> 
>   I am willing to test anything (I'm the only actual employee of
> sandelman.ca, everyone else are contracted, and do their own thing).
>   I'm also happy to hack things in minor ways, but I have no time to
> lead.
> 


That leads to another issue.  Payroll for employees is one thing, but
for those who are contractors, filing of 1099s in the US is another
issue similar to the W2 and should be contained as well.