From: Mark W. <wa...@ea...> - 2004-10-11 17:27:26
|
Santoken, I think you should take a close look a some free demos from the pay for companies. There are reports that must be filed electronically for the payroll to work for evenly small companies. I would be happy to point you to some of the demos if you would like. Write me off list and I will send you some. Mark Santoken wrote: > List, > > After the last few weeks' discussions regarding payroll, and what > appeared to be an opinion of work-arounds, lack of need, etc. I > started planning my own. > > My theory was a plugin to SL. Working with SL, but not within. My > fear would be to create a module, then the next update that I wanted > came out, I'd have to recode the payroll. > > I'm not a coder, but I do dabble. I'm sure that I will be using > improper jargon, but here's what I've came up with at this point: > > My module would be perl/sql based. It would work hand in hand with > SL, posting approiatly directly to the SL db. First, the deductions > would be defined in a Deductions Definition screen. Each deduction > would be entered in a formula format and assigned a deduction varible > or tag name. Example being for the FICA deduction, you could name it > FICA. For Barney Fife's child support, you could name it BFCS, etc. > You could assign each deduction an order of preference, if you so > need. Some deductions would be pre-tax, some post-tax. > > We then move on to the employee definition screem, where you assign > the deduction tags to the employee. > > Then, a payroll generation screen, to select/deselect the employees > for that generation. Once the generation is complete, you print > checks, and post. > > While I'm sure that I have missed some things, that is the general > jist of what I had in mind. Funny this came up just today, because I > actually started work last night :) I spent the last few days with > the concept, and figured that with winter coming, I would have > something by spring. Anyone have an thoughts? > > Kent > > > > Vicki Reeves wrote: > >> I'm thinking that an international payroll might be possible if it >> included lots of ways to adjust withholdings. >> >> For example, choices for each withholding might include: >> * will this formula operate against gross (stage 1) or against >> 'almost net' which would be the total after all stage 1 adjustments >> are completed? >> >> * will this withholding be a percentage, a set amount or a user >> defined formula? User defined formulas could allow for things like >> ((gross - 241) * 0.125) >> >> * is this withholding applied every payperiod or event triggered? >> Perhaps this could be used to allow for once a month withholdings >> when the payroll is prepared weekly, etc. >> >> * what will be the title of this withholding? >> >> * to what vendor and account will this withholding relate? >> >> Since the withholdings are very flexable and you would be able to >> setup as many as necessary, this should take care of the tax type >> requirements of wherever and allow for things like garnishments, >> insurance, etc. >> >> Something similar could be used to allow for additions such as >> payments of child care allowances, commissions, etc. >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out > more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@sq... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > |