sprog-users

[sprog-users] Test Errors and final touches on Sprog RPM for Fedora Core 5 Extras

[Gavin H. <gh...@fe...>]

Dear Guys,

This is the current specfile:

http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/Sprog.spec

It now has a desktop icon:

http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/sprog-logo.png

Is this icon ok?

Lastly, it's all ready to go, but now we get Test Errors:

t/18_command_filter....dubious
        Test returned status 0 (wstat 13, 0xd)
DIED. FAILED tests 15-19
        Failed 5/19 tests, 73.68% okay

Any ideas?

Gavin.

--
Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry,
Editorial Staff.
FedoraNEWS.ORG (http://FedoraNEWS.ORG)

Re: [sprog-users] Test Errors and final touches on Sprog RPM for Fedora Core 5 Extras

[Grant M. <gr...@mc...>]

Hi Gavin

On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 23:59 +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
> Dear Guys,
> 
> This is the current specfile:
> 
> http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/Sprog.spec
> 
> It now has a desktop icon:
> 
> http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/sprog-logo.png
> 
> Is this icon ok?

Hmmmm, it's not really ideal.  I've had 'icon' on the todo list for some
time, but in the absence of an official icon, I just use the standard
gnome-run.png that ships with GNOME.

> Lastly, it's all ready to go, but now we get Test Errors:
> 
> t/18_command_filter....dubious
>         Test returned status 0 (wstat 13, 0xd)
> DIED. FAILED tests 15-19
>         Failed 5/19 tests, 73.68% okay

Try running this command to see if it gives any more clues:

  prove -v t/18_command_filter.t

It looks like it's dying in test number 15.  That test is really just a
placeholder while I consider how to get better diagnostics from
attempting to run a command that doesn't exist.  I'm not sure why it's
failing for you, but it's entirely non-critical so you could skip it
with the attached patch.


Thanks for 'keeping the faith' Gavin.  Real life has been getting in the
way of Sprog development for a while now, but I haven't abandoned it :-)

Cheers
Grant

Re: [sprog-users] Test Errors and final touches on Sprog RPM for Fedora Core 5 Extras

[Gavin H. <gh...@fe...>]

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:28:58 +1300, Grant McLean wrote
> Hi Gavin
> 
> On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 23:59 +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
> > Dear Guys,
> > 
> > This is the current specfile:
> > 
> > http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/Sprog.spec
> > 
> > It now has a desktop icon:
> > 
> > http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/sprog-logo.png
> > 
> > Is this icon ok?
> 
> Hmmmm, it's not really ideal.  I've had 'icon' on the todo list for some
> time, but in the absence of an official icon, I just use the standard
> gnome-run.png that ships with GNOME.

I thought so. Send us one over then ;-)

> 
> > Lastly, it's all ready to go, but now we get Test Errors:
> > 
> > t/18_command_filter....dubious
> >         Test returned status 0 (wstat 13, 0xd)
> > DIED. FAILED tests 15-19
> >         Failed 5/19 tests, 73.68% okay
> 
> Try running this command to see if it gives any more clues:
> 
>   prove -v t/18_command_filter.t
> 
> It looks like it's dying in test number 15.  That test is really 
> just a placeholder while I consider how to get better diagnostics 
> from attempting to run a command that doesn't exist.  I'm not sure 
> why it's failing for you, but it's entirely non-critical so you 
> could skip it with the attached patch.

Fair enough. Me neither. Just happened lately. It has worked fine before on
this machine. Here's the verbose output:

t/18_command_filter....1..19
ok 1 - use TestApp;
ok 2 - use Sprog::Gear::CommandFilter;
not ok 3 - no alerts while creating machine

#     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 14)
#          got: 'Unable to create a LineSink object
# Base class package "Sprog::Mixin::InputByLine" is empty.
#     (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first.)
#  at t/lib/LineSink.pm line 13
# BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/lib/LineSink.pm line 16.
# Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Sprog.pm
line 295.
#
# '
#     expected: ''
not ok 4 - filter gear isa Sprog::Gear::CommandFilter

#     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 16)
#     filter gear isn't defined
not ok 5 - filter gear also isa Sprog::Mixin::OutputToFH

#     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 17)
#     filter gear also isn't defined
not ok 6 - filter gear also isa Sprog::Mixin::InputFromFH

#     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 18)
#     filter gear also isn't defined
not ok 7 - filter gear also isa Sprog::Gear

#     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 19)
#     filter gear also isn't defined
Can't call method "has_input" on an undefined value at t/18_command_filter.t
line 21.
# Looks like you planned 19 tests but only ran 7.
# Looks like your test died just after 7.
dubious
        Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
DIED. FAILED tests 3-19
        Failed 17/19 tests, 10.53% okay
Failed Test           Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/18_command_filter.t  255 65280    19   29 152.63%  3-19
Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 17/19 subtests failed, 10.53% okay.


> 
> Thanks for 'keeping the faith' Gavin.  Real life has been getting in 
> the way of Sprog development for a while now, but I haven't 
> abandoned it :-)

I'll apply this patch later today and get this thing released :-)

> 
> Cheers
> Grant


--
Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry,
Editorial Staff.
FedoraNEWS.ORG (http://FedoraNEWS.ORG)

Re: [sprog-users] Test Errors and final touches on Sprog RPM for Fedora Core 5 Extras

[Grant M. <gr...@mc...>]

On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 08:50 +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:28:58 +1300, Grant McLean wrote
> > Hi Gavin
> > 
> > On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 23:59 +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
> > > Dear Guys,
> > > 
> > > This is the current specfile:
> > > 
> > > http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/Sprog.spec
> > > 
> > > It now has a desktop icon:
> > > 
> > > http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/sprog-logo.png
> > > 
> > > Is this icon ok?
> > 
> > Hmmmm, it's not really ideal.  I've had 'icon' on the todo list for some
> > time, but in the absence of an official icon, I just use the standard
> > gnome-run.png that ships with GNOME.
> 
> I thought so. Send us one over then ;-)

Attached.
 
> > > Lastly, it's all ready to go, but now we get Test Errors:
> > > 
> > > t/18_command_filter....dubious
> > >         Test returned status 0 (wstat 13, 0xd)
> > > DIED. FAILED tests 15-19
> > >         Failed 5/19 tests, 73.68% okay
> > 
> > Try running this command to see if it gives any more clues:
> > 
> >   prove -v t/18_command_filter.t
> > 
> > It looks like it's dying in test number 15.  That test is really 
> > just a placeholder while I consider how to get better diagnostics 
> > from attempting to run a command that doesn't exist.  I'm not sure 
> > why it's failing for you, but it's entirely non-critical so you 
> > could skip it with the attached patch.
> 
> Fair enough. Me neither. Just happened lately. It has worked fine before on
> this machine. Here's the verbose output:
> 
> t/18_command_filter....1..19
> ok 1 - use TestApp;
> ok 2 - use Sprog::Gear::CommandFilter;
> not ok 3 - no alerts while creating machine
> 
> #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 14)
> #          got: 'Unable to create a LineSink object
> # Base class package "Sprog::Mixin::InputByLine" is empty.
> #     (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first.)
> #  at t/lib/LineSink.pm line 13
> # BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/lib/LineSink.pm line 16.
> # Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Sprog.pm
> line 295.
> #
> # '
> #     expected: ''
> not ok 4 - filter gear isa Sprog::Gear::CommandFilter
> 
> #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 16)
> #     filter gear isn't defined
> not ok 5 - filter gear also isa Sprog::Mixin::OutputToFH
> 
> #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 17)
> #     filter gear also isn't defined
> not ok 6 - filter gear also isa Sprog::Mixin::InputFromFH
> 
> #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 18)
> #     filter gear also isn't defined
> not ok 7 - filter gear also isa Sprog::Gear
> 
> #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 19)
> #     filter gear also isn't defined
> Can't call method "has_input" on an undefined value at t/18_command_filter.t
> line 21.
> # Looks like you planned 19 tests but only ran 7.
> # Looks like your test died just after 7.
> dubious
>         Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
> DIED. FAILED tests 3-19
>         Failed 17/19 tests, 10.53% okay
> Failed Test           Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> t/18_command_filter.t  255 65280    19   29 152.63%  3-19
> Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 17/19 subtests failed, 10.53% okay.

So now it's failing tests 3-19 whereas originally it was failing 15-19.
This time it's failing catastrophically because the InputByLine mixin
hasn't been loaded even though its explicitly mentioned by the 'use
base' in t/lib/LineSink.pm.

It looks like there's something really basic gone wrong here.  I wonder
if there might be some conflict between a version of Sprog that's
already installed and the version being tested.

Regards
Grant

Re: [sprog-users] Test Errors and final touches on Sprog RPM for Fedora Core 5 Extras

[Gavin H. <gh...@fe...>]

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:26:55 +1300, Grant McLean wrote
> On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 08:50 +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:28:58 +1300, Grant McLean wrote
> > > Hi Gavin
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 23:59 +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
> > > > Dear Guys,
> > > > 
> > > > This is the current specfile:
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/Sprog.spec
> > > > 
> > > > It now has a desktop icon:
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/sprog-logo.png
> > > > 
> > > > Is this icon ok?
> > > 
> > > Hmmmm, it's not really ideal.  I've had 'icon' on the todo list for some
> > > time, but in the absence of an official icon, I just use the standard
> > > gnome-run.png that ships with GNOME.
> > 
> > I thought so. Send us one over then ;-)
> 
> Attached.
> 
> > > > Lastly, it's all ready to go, but now we get Test Errors:
> > > > 
> > > > t/18_command_filter....dubious
> > > >         Test returned status 0 (wstat 13, 0xd)
> > > > DIED. FAILED tests 15-19
> > > >         Failed 5/19 tests, 73.68% okay
> > > 
> > > Try running this command to see if it gives any more clues:
> > > 
> > >   prove -v t/18_command_filter.t
> > > 
> > > It looks like it's dying in test number 15.  That test is really 
> > > just a placeholder while I consider how to get better diagnostics 
> > > from attempting to run a command that doesn't exist.  I'm not sure 
> > > why it's failing for you, but it's entirely non-critical so you 
> > > could skip it with the attached patch.
> > 
> > Fair enough. Me neither. Just happened lately. It has worked fine before on
> > this machine. Here's the verbose output:
> > 
> > t/18_command_filter....1..19
> > ok 1 - use TestApp;
> > ok 2 - use Sprog::Gear::CommandFilter;
> > not ok 3 - no alerts while creating machine
> > 
> > #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 14)
> > #          got: 'Unable to create a LineSink object
> > # Base class package "Sprog::Mixin::InputByLine" is empty.
> > #     (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first.)
> > #  at t/lib/LineSink.pm line 13
> > # BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/lib/LineSink.pm line 16.
> > # Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Sprog.pm
> > line 295.
> > #
> > # '
> > #     expected: ''
> > not ok 4 - filter gear isa Sprog::Gear::CommandFilter
> > 
> > #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 16)
> > #     filter gear isn't defined
> > not ok 5 - filter gear also isa Sprog::Mixin::OutputToFH
> > 
> > #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 17)
> > #     filter gear also isn't defined
> > not ok 6 - filter gear also isa Sprog::Mixin::InputFromFH
> > 
> > #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 18)
> > #     filter gear also isn't defined
> > not ok 7 - filter gear also isa Sprog::Gear
> > 
> > #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 19)
> > #     filter gear also isn't defined
> > Can't call method "has_input" on an undefined value at t/18_command_filter.t
> > line 21.
> > # Looks like you planned 19 tests but only ran 7.
> > # Looks like your test died just after 7.
> > dubious
> >         Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
> > DIED. FAILED tests 3-19
> >         Failed 17/19 tests, 10.53% okay
> > Failed Test           Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
> >
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > t/18_command_filter.t  255 65280    19   29 152.63%  3-19
> > Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 17/19 subtests failed, 10.53% okay.
> 
> So now it's failing tests 3-19 whereas originally it was failing 15-19.
> This time it's failing catastrophically because the InputByLine mixin
> hasn't been loaded even though its explicitly mentioned by the 'use
> base' in t/lib/LineSink.pm.
> 
> It looks like there's something really basic gone wrong here.  I wonder
> if there might be some conflict between a version of Sprog that's
> already installed and the version being tested.
> 
> Regards
> Grant

That could be the case. Can I issue a make uninstall first?

--
Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry,
Editorial Staff.
FedoraNEWS.ORG (http://FedoraNEWS.ORG)

Re: [sprog-users] Test Errors and final touches on Sprog RPM for Fedora Core 5 Extras

[Grant M. <gr...@mc...>]

On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 11:41 +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:26:55 +1300, Grant McLean wrote
>  
> > It looks like there's something really basic gone wrong here.  I wonder
> > if there might be some conflict between a version of Sprog that's
> > already installed and the version being tested.
>
> That could be the case. Can I issue a make uninstall first?

I don't think make uninstall generally does anything useful.  I usually
just do something like:

  rm -rf /usr/share/perl5/Sprog*

'perldoc -l Sprog' will tell you where it's installed.

Regards
Grant

Re: [sprog-users] Test Errors and final touches on Sprog RPM for Fedora Core 5 Extras

[Gavin H. <gh...@fe...>]

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:59:37 +1300, Grant McLean wrote
> On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 11:41 +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:26:55 +1300, Grant McLean wrote
> >  
> > > It looks like there's something really basic gone wrong here.  I wonder
> > > if there might be some conflict between a version of Sprog that's
> > > already installed and the version being tested.
> >
> > That could be the case. Can I issue a make uninstall first?
> 
> I don't think make uninstall generally does anything useful.  I usually
> just do something like:
> 
>   rm -rf /usr/share/perl5/Sprog*
> 
> 'perldoc -l Sprog' will tell you where it's installed.

No build errors now!!!

> 
> Regards
> Grant
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
> Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
> for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> sprog-users mailing list
> spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sprog-users


--
Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry,
Editorial Staff.
FedoraNEWS.ORG (http://FedoraNEWS.ORG)