Re: [sprog-users] Test Errors and final touches on Sprog RPM for Fedora Core 5 Extras

[Gavin H. <gh...@fe...>]

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:26:55 +1300, Grant McLean wrote
> On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 08:50 +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:28:58 +1300, Grant McLean wrote
> > > Hi Gavin
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 23:59 +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
> > > > Dear Guys,
> > > > 
> > > > This is the current specfile:
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/Sprog.spec
> > > > 
> > > > It now has a desktop icon:
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/sprog-logo.png
> > > > 
> > > > Is this icon ok?
> > > 
> > > Hmmmm, it's not really ideal.  I've had 'icon' on the todo list for some
> > > time, but in the absence of an official icon, I just use the standard
> > > gnome-run.png that ships with GNOME.
> > 
> > I thought so. Send us one over then ;-)
> 
> Attached.
> 
> > > > Lastly, it's all ready to go, but now we get Test Errors:
> > > > 
> > > > t/18_command_filter....dubious
> > > >         Test returned status 0 (wstat 13, 0xd)
> > > > DIED. FAILED tests 15-19
> > > >         Failed 5/19 tests, 73.68% okay
> > > 
> > > Try running this command to see if it gives any more clues:
> > > 
> > >   prove -v t/18_command_filter.t
> > > 
> > > It looks like it's dying in test number 15.  That test is really 
> > > just a placeholder while I consider how to get better diagnostics 
> > > from attempting to run a command that doesn't exist.  I'm not sure 
> > > why it's failing for you, but it's entirely non-critical so you 
> > > could skip it with the attached patch.
> > 
> > Fair enough. Me neither. Just happened lately. It has worked fine before on
> > this machine. Here's the verbose output:
> > 
> > t/18_command_filter....1..19
> > ok 1 - use TestApp;
> > ok 2 - use Sprog::Gear::CommandFilter;
> > not ok 3 - no alerts while creating machine
> > 
> > #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 14)
> > #          got: 'Unable to create a LineSink object
> > # Base class package "Sprog::Mixin::InputByLine" is empty.
> > #     (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first.)
> > #  at t/lib/LineSink.pm line 13
> > # BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/lib/LineSink.pm line 16.
> > # Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Sprog.pm
> > line 295.
> > #
> > # '
> > #     expected: ''
> > not ok 4 - filter gear isa Sprog::Gear::CommandFilter
> > 
> > #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 16)
> > #     filter gear isn't defined
> > not ok 5 - filter gear also isa Sprog::Mixin::OutputToFH
> > 
> > #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 17)
> > #     filter gear also isn't defined
> > not ok 6 - filter gear also isa Sprog::Mixin::InputFromFH
> > 
> > #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 18)
> > #     filter gear also isn't defined
> > not ok 7 - filter gear also isa Sprog::Gear
> > 
> > #     Failed test (t/18_command_filter.t at line 19)
> > #     filter gear also isn't defined
> > Can't call method "has_input" on an undefined value at t/18_command_filter.t
> > line 21.
> > # Looks like you planned 19 tests but only ran 7.
> > # Looks like your test died just after 7.
> > dubious
> >         Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
> > DIED. FAILED tests 3-19
> >         Failed 17/19 tests, 10.53% okay
> > Failed Test           Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
> >
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > t/18_command_filter.t  255 65280    19   29 152.63%  3-19
> > Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 17/19 subtests failed, 10.53% okay.
> 
> So now it's failing tests 3-19 whereas originally it was failing 15-19.
> This time it's failing catastrophically because the InputByLine mixin
> hasn't been loaded even though its explicitly mentioned by the 'use
> base' in t/lib/LineSink.pm.
> 
> It looks like there's something really basic gone wrong here.  I wonder
> if there might be some conflict between a version of Sprog that's
> already installed and the version being tested.
> 
> Regards
> Grant

That could be the case. Can I issue a make uninstall first?

--
Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry,
Editorial Staff.
FedoraNEWS.ORG (http://FedoraNEWS.ORG)