springnet-developer — Mailing list for development related to the Spring Framework .NET

Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

[Kenneth X. <KX...@bn...>]

I usually do not use Trace.Debug as Common.Logging is my favorite :) I can certainly give it a try and let you know.

 

BTW, thanks for the quick implementation of the in memory sink in Common.Logging 2.0. Hope I’m not asking too much :) but 

1.       It would be great if I can set the log level independently on each logger when unit testing

2.       How about a separate sink for individual logger? I feel my assert against the log event is much cleaner that way.

I did that for 1.2, you can take them if you want to make further modifications for 2.0.

 

From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] 
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 11:47 AM
To: Kenneth Xu; 'Mark Pollack'; spr...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

 

Great! Tx Kenneth for sharing your experience. I recently noticed Ayende complaining in twitter about not seeing any Trace.Debug() messages in DebugView when running NUnit 2.5 and thus switching to xUnit instead. Did you experience any similar issues?

 

-Erich

 

From: Kenneth Xu [mailto:KX...@bn...] 
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 5:38 PM
To: Erich Eichinger; Mark Pollack; spr...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

 

Mark and Erich, 

 

Just to share my experience. I used NUnit 2.5 in the Spring.Data.Extension, which is mainly an extract of our enhancement to Spring working with  ODP.Net. The parameterized test cases and generic support are great. TD.Net worked very. Here is an example that uses both generic and parameterized test cases.

 

http://code.google.com/p/kennethxublogsource/source/browse/trunk/SpringExtension/test/Spring.Data.Extension.Tests/Data/Generic/ExtendedRowMapperResultSetExtractorTest.cs

Cheers,

Kenneth

 

 

From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:32 AM
To: 'Mark Pollack'; spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out
Importance: Low

 

TD.NET might detect NUnit extensions already. R#'s implementation of the runner is entirely decoupled from NUnit - they just look for attributes named "TestFixtureAttribute" and "TestAttribute" using reflection and string comparison and use their own testrunner implementation. I don't think R# 4.5 improved this. But think there are alternatives out there, I know for Gallio/MbUnit there are, which might be able to run nunit tests as well.

 

I just need to upgrade the Nunitaspex stuff and we should be done. Although when we upgrade to nunit 2.5 for 1.2.1 we could upgrade logging as well then... - your turn ;-)

 

-Erich 

 

From: Mark Pollack [mailto:Mar...@sp...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:18 PM
To: Eric Eichinger; spr...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

 

Hi,

 

Cool.  Sounds like it is time to take a look again at resharper etc., to see if they will detect NUnit extensions so we can get things like the ‘Spring TestContext Framework’ going – (weird name) http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/reference/testing.html#testcontext-framework

 

Uses attributes instead of inheritance…  I implemented a bit of this a long time ago but only the NUnit GUI runner still recognized the test fixture with a [ContextConfiguration] attribute… not Resharper or TestDriven.NET L

 

I don’t see direct support for ordering of tests… still to unit testy focused…..  Did I miss something?

 

Mark

 

 

From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:22 AM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

 

seems to have some very interesting features including executing threaded tests, parameterized tests and better extensibility:

 

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/altdotnet/message/21599

 

-Erich

 



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be CONFIDENTIAL,
PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended
only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein.  If you are not an intended recipient,
please send an email immediately to pos...@bn...  and take the steps necessary to delete
the message completely from your computer system.

 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be CONFIDENTIAL,
PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended
only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein.  If you are not an intended recipient,
please send an email immediately to pos...@bn...  and take the steps necessary to delete
the message completely from your computer system.

Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

[Kenneth X. <KX...@bn...>]

Mark and Erich, 

 

Just to share my experience. I used NUnit 2.5 in the Spring.Data.Extension, which is mainly an extract of our enhancement to Spring working with  ODP.Net. The parameterized test cases and generic support are great. TD.Net worked very. Here is an example that uses both generic and parameterized test cases.

 

http://code.google.com/p/kennethxublogsource/source/browse/trunk/SpringExtension/test/Spring.Data.Extension.Tests/Data/Generic/ExtendedRowMapperResultSetExtractorTest.cs

Cheers,

Kenneth

 

 

From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:32 AM
To: 'Mark Pollack'; spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out
Importance: Low

 

TD.NET might detect NUnit extensions already. R#'s implementation of the runner is entirely decoupled from NUnit - they just look for attributes named "TestFixtureAttribute" and "TestAttribute" using reflection and string comparison and use their own testrunner implementation. I don't think R# 4.5 improved this. But think there are alternatives out there, I know for Gallio/MbUnit there are, which might be able to run nunit tests as well.

 

I just need to upgrade the Nunitaspex stuff and we should be done. Although when we upgrade to nunit 2.5 for 1.2.1 we could upgrade logging as well then... - your turn ;-)

 

-Erich 

 

From: Mark Pollack [mailto:Mar...@sp...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:18 PM
To: Eric Eichinger; spr...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

 

Hi,

 

Cool.  Sounds like it is time to take a look again at resharper etc., to see if they will detect NUnit extensions so we can get things like the ‘Spring TestContext Framework’ going – (weird name) http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/reference/testing.html#testcontext-framework

 

Uses attributes instead of inheritance…  I implemented a bit of this a long time ago but only the NUnit GUI runner still recognized the test fixture with a [ContextConfiguration] attribute… not Resharper or TestDriven.NET L

 

I don’t see direct support for ordering of tests… still to unit testy focused…..  Did I miss something?

 

Mark

 

 

From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:22 AM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

 

seems to have some very interesting features including executing threaded tests, parameterized tests and better extensibility:

 

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/altdotnet/message/21599

 

-Erich

 



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be CONFIDENTIAL,
PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended
only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein.  If you are not an intended recipient,
please send an email immediately to pos...@bn...  and take the steps necessary to delete
the message completely from your computer system.

Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

[Erich E. <eei...@gm...>]

Great! Tx Kenneth for sharing your experience. I recently noticed Ayende complaining in twitter about not seeing any Trace.Debug() messages in DebugView when running NUnit 2.5 and thus switching to xUnit instead. Did you experience any similar issues?

 

-Erich

 

From: Kenneth Xu [mailto:KX...@bn...] 
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 5:38 PM
To: Erich Eichinger; Mark Pollack; spr...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

 

Mark and Erich, 

 

Just to share my experience. I used NUnit 2.5 in the Spring.Data.Extension, which is mainly an extract of our enhancement to Spring working with  ODP.Net. The parameterized test cases and generic support are great. TD.Net worked very. Here is an example that uses both generic and parameterized test cases.

 

http://code.google.com/p/kennethxublogsource/source/browse/trunk/SpringExtension/test/Spring.Data.Extension.Tests/Data/Generic/ExtendedRowMapperResultSetExtractorTest.cs

Cheers,

Kenneth

 

 

From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:32 AM
To: 'Mark Pollack'; spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out
Importance: Low

 

TD.NET might detect NUnit extensions already. R#'s implementation of the runner is entirely decoupled from NUnit - they just look for attributes named "TestFixtureAttribute" and "TestAttribute" using reflection and string comparison and use their own testrunner implementation. I don't think R# 4.5 improved this. But think there are alternatives out there, I know for Gallio/MbUnit there are, which might be able to run nunit tests as well.

 

I just need to upgrade the Nunitaspex stuff and we should be done. Although when we upgrade to nunit 2.5 for 1.2.1 we could upgrade logging as well then... - your turn ;-)

 

-Erich 

 

From: Mark Pollack [mailto:Mar...@sp...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:18 PM
To: Eric Eichinger; spr...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

 

Hi,

 

Cool.  Sounds like it is time to take a look again at resharper etc., to see if they will detect NUnit extensions so we can get things like the ‘Spring TestContext Framework’ going – (weird name) http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/reference/testing.html#testcontext-framework

 

Uses attributes instead of inheritance…  I implemented a bit of this a long time ago but only the NUnit GUI runner still recognized the test fixture with a [ContextConfiguration] attribute… not Resharper or TestDriven.NET L

 

I don’t see direct support for ordering of tests… still to unit testy focused…..  Did I miss something?

 

Mark

 

 

From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:22 AM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

 

seems to have some very interesting features including executing threaded tests, parameterized tests and better extensibility:

 

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/altdotnet/message/21599

 

-Erich

 



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be CONFIDENTIAL,
PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended
only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein.  If you are not an intended recipient,
please send an email immediately to pos...@bn...  and take the steps necessary to delete
the message completely from your computer system.

 

Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

[Erich E. <eei...@gm...>]

TD.NET might detect NUnit extensions already. R#'s implementation of the runner is entirely decoupled from NUnit - they just look for attributes named "TestFixtureAttribute" and "TestAttribute" using reflection and string comparison and use their own testrunner implementation. I don't think R# 4.5 improved this. But think there are alternatives out there, I know for Gallio/MbUnit there are, which might be able to run nunit tests as well.

 

I just need to upgrade the Nunitaspex stuff and we should be done. Although when we upgrade to nunit 2.5 for 1.2.1 we could upgrade logging as well then... - your turn ;-)

 

-Erich 

 

From: Mark Pollack [mailto:Mar...@sp...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:18 PM
To: Eric Eichinger; spr...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

 

Hi,

 

Cool.  Sounds like it is time to take a look again at resharper etc., to see if they will detect NUnit extensions so we can get things like the ‘Spring TestContext Framework’ going – (weird name) http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/reference/testing.html#testcontext-framework

 

Uses attributes instead of inheritance…  I implemented a bit of this a long time ago but only the NUnit GUI runner still recognized the test fixture with a [ContextConfiguration] attribute… not Resharper or TestDriven.NET L

 

I don’t see direct support for ordering of tests… still to unit testy focused…..  Did I miss something?

 

Mark

 

 

From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:22 AM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

 

seems to have some very interesting features including executing threaded tests, parameterized tests and better extensibility:

 

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/altdotnet/message/21599

 

-Erich

 



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

[Mark P. <Mar...@sp...>]

Hi,



Cool.  Sounds like it is time to take a look again at resharper etc., to see if they will detect NUnit extensions so we can get things like the ‘Spring TestContext Framework’ going – (weird name) http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/reference/testing.html#testcontext-framework



Uses attributes instead of inheritance…  I implemented a bit of this a long time ago but only the NUnit GUI runner still recognized the test fixture with a [ContextConfiguration] attribute… not Resharper or TestDriven.NET L



I don’t see direct support for ordering of tests… still to unit testy focused…..  Did I miss something?



Mark





From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:22 AM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out



seems to have some very interesting features including executing threaded tests, parameterized tests and better extensibility:



http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/altdotnet/message/21599



-Erich





__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

[Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out

[Erich E. <eei...@gm...>]

seems to have some very interesting features including executing threaded tests, parameterized tests and better extensibility:

 

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/altdotnet/message/21599

 

-Erich

 

[Springnet-developer] Conversation per Business Transaction with Spring.NET and NHibernate

[Erich E. <eei...@gm...>]

After a great "pairing" session yesterday, Fabio Maulo from NHibernate did a
great job and completed  as well as blogged about his new Spring.NET
<http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2009/04/spring-in-nhibernates-conversation-p
er.html>  support for the Conversation per Business Transaction approach.

 

cheers,

Erich

 

Re: [Springnet-developer] [ANN] Common.Logging 2.0 Released

[<eei...@gm...>]

+1

-- Ursprüngl. Mitteil. --
Betreff:	Re: [Springnet-developer] [ANN] Common.Logging 2.0 Released
Von:	Mark Pollack <Mar...@sp...>
Datum:		27.04.2009 13:45

I know we went back and forth on this, the latest sentiment was that  
we should not update a major version of a dependent library, there  
were some classes moved around in namespaces and although unlikely to  
cause issues with users it seems best to be conservative with versions  
of dependencies. Sorry for the confusion, once 1.2.1 is done and the  
march to 2.0 starts we can update common logging.
Cheers,
Mark

On Apr 27, 2009, at 6:24 AM, "Marko Lahma" <mar...@gm...>  
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Great job, nice improvements! So I will prepare Quartz.NET 1.0.1 with
> CLogging 1.2 on Framework 1.1 build and CLogging 2.0 for Quartz.NET
> 2.0 build. This will be how Spring.NET uses these new versions I if
> understand correctly?
>
> -Marko
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Erich Eichinger <eei...@gm... 
> > wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> I just released Common.Logging 2.0 - you can pick it up at
>> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net
>>
>>
>>
>> The reference documentation can be found at
>> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/docs/2.0.0/reference/html/index.html
>>
>> The new SDK documentation is here:
>>  http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/docs/2.0.0/api/html/index.html
>>
>>
>>
>> There is a whole bunch of new features, bridging between all  
>> supported
>> logging libraries, an extended ILog interface for convenient usage,  
>> base
>> classes for implementing your own adapters and performance  
>> improvements
>> (checkout my blog at
>> http://eeichinger.blogspot.com/2009/01/thoughts-on-systemdiagnostics-trace-vs.html 
>> )
>> among them.
>>
>>
>>
>> Here's the complete list:
>>
>>
>>
>> Common.Logging CHANGELOG
>>
>> =====================================
>>
>> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net
>>
>>
>>
>> Release 2.0.0, April 26 2009
>>
>>
>>
>> Summary: New Features and Bug Fix release
>>
>>
>>
>> IMPORTANT NOTE:
>>
>> starting with version 2.0 we dropped support for .NET versions 1.0  
>> and 1.1.
>> - if you need support
>>
>> for those platforms please download Common.Logging 1.2
>>
>>
>>
>> Breaking Changes
>>
>> *) LogManager.ConfigurationReader is readonly now -> use  
>> LogManager.Reset()
>> instead
>>
>>
>>
>> Feature Requests
>>
>>
>>
>> [2781806] - routing from 3rd party lib back to Common.Logging
>>
>> [2778784] - Add In-Memory
>> LoggerFactoryAdapter->CapturingLoggerFactoryAdapter
>>
>> [2485203] - Add support for EntLib 4.1 logging
>>
>> [2512017] - Provide base classes for implementing custom  
>> factoryAdapters
>>
>> [1810787] - Add source code to distribution
>>
>> [1826632] - Make Common.Logging ClsCompliant
>>
>> [1970386] - Support for Enterprise Library 4.0
>>
>> [1852882] - Add optimize flag + PdbOnly in release build
>>
>> [1847554] - Add TraceListener to capture Diagnostics.Trace calls
>>
>> [1710163] - Add xxxFormat methods to Common.Logging.ILog interface
>>
>> [2545123] - Add LogManager.GetCurrentClassLogger()
>>
>> [1810785] - Clean up code comments
>>
>>
>>
>> Bug Fixes
>>
>>
>>
>> [1683776] - Implementations of ILog are not serializable
>>
>> [1683773] - Add log4net 1.2.9 .dll to distribution for .NET 1.0
>>
>> [1683772] - Null Pointer Exception when passing in null value for msg
>>
>> [1683774] - Add unit tests for Common.Logging
>>
>> [1846258] - ConfigurationSectionHandler not case-insensitive in NET  
>> 2.0
>>
>>
>>
>> enjoy,
>>
>> Erich
>>
>>
>>
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
>> Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
>> royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally  
>> facing
>> server and web deployment.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
>> _______________________________________________
>> Springnet-developer mailing list
>> Spr...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer
>>
>>
>
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
> royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally  
> facing
> server and web deployment.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> _______________________________________________
> Springnet-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer

<<winmail.dat>>

Re: [Springnet-developer] [ANN] Common.Logging 2.0 Released

[Mark P. <Mar...@sp...>]

I know we went back and forth on this, the latest sentiment was that  
we should not update a major version of a dependent library, there  
were some classes moved around in namespaces and although unlikely to  
cause issues with users it seems best to be conservative with versions  
of dependencies. Sorry for the confusion, once 1.2.1 is done and the  
march to 2.0 starts we can update common logging.
Cheers,
Mark

On Apr 27, 2009, at 6:24 AM, "Marko Lahma" <mar...@gm...>  
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Great job, nice improvements! So I will prepare Quartz.NET 1.0.1 with
> CLogging 1.2 on Framework 1.1 build and CLogging 2.0 for Quartz.NET
> 2.0 build. This will be how Spring.NET uses these new versions I if
> understand correctly?
>
> -Marko
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Erich Eichinger <eei...@gm... 
> > wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> I just released Common.Logging 2.0 - you can pick it up at
>> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net
>>
>>
>>
>> The reference documentation can be found at
>> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/docs/2.0.0/reference/html/index.html
>>
>> The new SDK documentation is here:
>>  http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/docs/2.0.0/api/html/index.html
>>
>>
>>
>> There is a whole bunch of new features, bridging between all  
>> supported
>> logging libraries, an extended ILog interface for convenient usage,  
>> base
>> classes for implementing your own adapters and performance  
>> improvements
>> (checkout my blog at
>> http://eeichinger.blogspot.com/2009/01/thoughts-on-systemdiagnostics-trace-vs.html 
>> )
>> among them.
>>
>>
>>
>> Here's the complete list:
>>
>>
>>
>> Common.Logging CHANGELOG
>>
>> =====================================
>>
>> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net
>>
>>
>>
>> Release 2.0.0, April 26 2009
>>
>>
>>
>> Summary: New Features and Bug Fix release
>>
>>
>>
>> IMPORTANT NOTE:
>>
>> starting with version 2.0 we dropped support for .NET versions 1.0  
>> and 1.1.
>> - if you need support
>>
>> for those platforms please download Common.Logging 1.2
>>
>>
>>
>> Breaking Changes
>>
>> *) LogManager.ConfigurationReader is readonly now -> use  
>> LogManager.Reset()
>> instead
>>
>>
>>
>> Feature Requests
>>
>>
>>
>> [2781806] - routing from 3rd party lib back to Common.Logging
>>
>> [2778784] - Add In-Memory
>> LoggerFactoryAdapter->CapturingLoggerFactoryAdapter
>>
>> [2485203] - Add support for EntLib 4.1 logging
>>
>> [2512017] - Provide base classes for implementing custom  
>> factoryAdapters
>>
>> [1810787] - Add source code to distribution
>>
>> [1826632] - Make Common.Logging ClsCompliant
>>
>> [1970386] - Support for Enterprise Library 4.0
>>
>> [1852882] - Add optimize flag + PdbOnly in release build
>>
>> [1847554] - Add TraceListener to capture Diagnostics.Trace calls
>>
>> [1710163] - Add xxxFormat methods to Common.Logging.ILog interface
>>
>> [2545123] - Add LogManager.GetCurrentClassLogger()
>>
>> [1810785] - Clean up code comments
>>
>>
>>
>> Bug Fixes
>>
>>
>>
>> [1683776] - Implementations of ILog are not serializable
>>
>> [1683773] - Add log4net 1.2.9 .dll to distribution for .NET 1.0
>>
>> [1683772] - Null Pointer Exception when passing in null value for msg
>>
>> [1683774] - Add unit tests for Common.Logging
>>
>> [1846258] - ConfigurationSectionHandler not case-insensitive in NET  
>> 2.0
>>
>>
>>
>> enjoy,
>>
>> Erich
>>
>>
>>
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
>> Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
>> royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally  
>> facing
>> server and web deployment.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
>> _______________________________________________
>> Springnet-developer mailing list
>> Spr...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer
>>
>>
>
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
> royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally  
> facing
> server and web deployment.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> _______________________________________________
> Springnet-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer

Re: [Springnet-developer] [ANN] Common.Logging 2.0 Released

[Mark P. <Mar...@sp...>]

Fantastic! Btw, we won't be updating to common logging 2.0 for spring 1.2.1, but wait instead for 2.0
Cheers,
Mark

On Apr 27, 2009, at 4:54 AM, "Erich Eichinger" <eei...@gm...<mailto:eei...@gm...>> wrote:

Hi Everyone,

I just released Common.Logging 2.0 - you can pick it up at <http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net

The reference documentation can be found at <http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/docs/2.0.0/reference/html/index.html> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/docs/2.0.0/reference/html/index.html
The new SDK documentation is here:  <http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/docs/2.0.0/api/html/index.html> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/docs/2.0.0/api/html/index.html

There is a whole bunch of new features, bridging between all supported logging libraries, an extended ILog interface for convenient usage, base classes for implementing your own adapters and performance improvements (checkout my blog at <http://eeichinger.blogspot.com/2009/01/thoughts-on-systemdiagnostics-trace-vs.html> http://eeichinger.blogspot.com/2009/01/thoughts-on-systemdiagnostics-trace-vs.html) among them.

Here's the complete list:

Common.Logging CHANGELOG
=====================================
<http://netcommon.sf.net>http://netcommon.sourceforge.net

Release 2.0.0, April 26 2009

Summary: New Features and Bug Fix release

IMPORTANT NOTE:
starting with version 2.0 we dropped support for .NET versions 1.0 and 1.1. - if you need support
for those platforms please download Common.Logging 1.2

Breaking Changes
*) LogManager.ConfigurationReader is readonly now -> use LogManager.Reset() instead

Feature Requests

[2781806] - routing from 3rd party lib back to Common.Logging
[2778784] - Add In-Memory LoggerFactoryAdapter->CapturingLoggerFactoryAdapter
[2485203] - Add support for EntLib 4.1 logging
[2512017] - Provide base classes for implementing custom factoryAdapters
[1810787] - Add source code to distribution
[1826632] - Make Common.Logging ClsCompliant
[1970386] - Support for Enterprise Library 4.0
[1852882] - Add optimize flag + PdbOnly in release build
[1847554] - Add TraceListener to capture Diagnostics.Trace calls
[1710163] - Add xxxFormat methods to Common.Logging.ILog interface
[2545123] - Add LogManager.GetCurrentClassLogger()
[1810785] - Clean up code comments

Bug Fixes

[1683776] - Implementations of ILog are not serializable
[1683773] - Add log4net 1.2.9 .dll to distribution for .NET 1.0
[1683772] - Null Pointer Exception when passing in null value for msg
[1683774] - Add unit tests for Common.Logging
[1846258] - ConfigurationSectionHandler not case-insensitive in NET 2.0

enjoy,
Erich

<ATT00001.c>
<ATT00002.c>

Re: [Springnet-developer] [ANN] Common.Logging 2.0 Released

[Marko L. <mar...@gm...>]

Hi,

Great job, nice improvements! So I will prepare Quartz.NET 1.0.1 with
CLogging 1.2 on Framework 1.1 build and CLogging 2.0 for Quartz.NET
2.0 build. This will be how Spring.NET uses these new versions I if
understand correctly?

-Marko

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Erich Eichinger <eei...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
>
> I just released Common.Logging 2.0 - you can pick it up at
> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net
>
>
>
> The reference documentation can be found at
> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/docs/2.0.0/reference/html/index.html
>
> The new SDK documentation is here:
>  http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/docs/2.0.0/api/html/index.html
>
>
>
> There is a whole bunch of new features, bridging between all supported
> logging libraries, an extended ILog interface for convenient usage, base
> classes for implementing your own adapters and performance improvements
> (checkout my blog at
> http://eeichinger.blogspot.com/2009/01/thoughts-on-systemdiagnostics-trace-vs.html)
> among them.
>
>
>
> Here's the complete list:
>
>
>
> Common.Logging CHANGELOG
>
> =====================================
>
> http://netcommon.sourceforge.net
>
>
>
> Release 2.0.0, April 26 2009
>
>
>
> Summary: New Features and Bug Fix release
>
>
>
> IMPORTANT NOTE:
>
> starting with version 2.0 we dropped support for .NET versions 1.0 and 1.1.
> - if you need support
>
> for those platforms please download Common.Logging 1.2
>
>
>
> Breaking Changes
>
> *) LogManager.ConfigurationReader is readonly now -> use LogManager.Reset()
> instead
>
>
>
> Feature Requests
>
>
>
> [2781806] - routing from 3rd party lib back to Common.Logging
>
> [2778784] - Add In-Memory
> LoggerFactoryAdapter->CapturingLoggerFactoryAdapter
>
> [2485203] - Add support for EntLib 4.1 logging
>
> [2512017] - Provide base classes for implementing custom factoryAdapters
>
> [1810787] - Add source code to distribution
>
> [1826632] - Make Common.Logging ClsCompliant
>
> [1970386] - Support for Enterprise Library 4.0
>
> [1852882] - Add optimize flag + PdbOnly in release build
>
> [1847554] - Add TraceListener to capture Diagnostics.Trace calls
>
> [1710163] - Add xxxFormat methods to Common.Logging.ILog interface
>
> [2545123] - Add LogManager.GetCurrentClassLogger()
>
> [1810785] - Clean up code comments
>
>
>
> Bug Fixes
>
>
>
> [1683776] - Implementations of ILog are not serializable
>
> [1683773] - Add log4net 1.2.9 .dll to distribution for .NET 1.0
>
> [1683772] - Null Pointer Exception when passing in null value for msg
>
> [1683774] - Add unit tests for Common.Logging
>
> [1846258] - ConfigurationSectionHandler not case-insensitive in NET 2.0
>
>
>
> enjoy,
>
> Erich
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
> royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
> server and web deployment.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> _______________________________________________
> Springnet-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer
>
>

[Springnet-developer] [ANN] Common.Logging 2.0 Released

[Erich E. <eei...@gm...>]

Hi Everyone,

 

I just released Common.Logging 2.0 - you can pick it up at
http://netcommon.sourceforge.net <http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/> 

 

The reference documentation can be found at
http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/docs/2.0.0/reference/html/index.html

The new SDK documentation is here:
http://netcommon.sourceforge.net/docs/2.0.0/api/html/index.html

 

There is a whole bunch of new features, bridging between all supported
logging libraries, an extended ILog interface for convenient usage, base
classes for implementing your own adapters and performance improvements
(checkout my blog at
http://eeichinger.blogspot.com/2009/01/thoughts-on-systemdiagnostics-trace-v
s.html) among them.

 

Here's the complete list:

 

Common.Logging CHANGELOG

=====================================

http://netcommon.sourceforge.net <http://netcommon.sf.net> 

 

Release 2.0.0, April 26 2009

 

Summary: New Features and Bug Fix release

 

IMPORTANT NOTE:

starting with version 2.0 we dropped support for .NET versions 1.0 and 1.1.
- if you need support

for those platforms please download Common.Logging 1.2

 

Breaking Changes

*) LogManager.ConfigurationReader is readonly now -> use LogManager.Reset()
instead

 

Feature Requests

 

[2781806] - routing from 3rd party lib back to Common.Logging

[2778784] - Add In-Memory
LoggerFactoryAdapter->CapturingLoggerFactoryAdapter

[2485203] - Add support for EntLib 4.1 logging

[2512017] - Provide base classes for implementing custom factoryAdapters

[1810787] - Add source code to distribution

[1826632] - Make Common.Logging ClsCompliant

[1970386] - Support for Enterprise Library 4.0

[1852882] - Add optimize flag + PdbOnly in release build

[1847554] - Add TraceListener to capture Diagnostics.Trace calls

[1710163] - Add xxxFormat methods to Common.Logging.ILog interface

[2545123] - Add LogManager.GetCurrentClassLogger()

[1810785] - Clean up code comments

 

Bug Fixes

 

[1683776] - Implementations of ILog are not serializable

[1683773] - Add log4net 1.2.9 .dll to distribution for .NET 1.0

[1683772] - Null Pointer Exception when passing in null value for msg

[1683774] - Add unit tests for Common.Logging

[1846258] - ConfigurationSectionHandler not case-insensitive in NET 2.0

 

enjoy,

Erich

 

[Springnet-developer] Load multiple contexts dinamically

[Marcos Y. <mar...@gm...>]

Hi guys,

I'm learning the framework to develop a web application and I gotta a
question about Contexts.
I saw that I can load multiples objects with GenericApplicationContext
and XmlObjectDefinitionReader,
but what I really need is do something that I can append other objects to
the *MAIN* context on application Init method.
For example, I have two web projects App.Core and App.Module1, where
App.Core has a reference to App.Module1. Both projects have Xml with objects
definitions. And when I load the App.Core on application Init method I get
the xml from App.Module1 to append on the App.Core context.

Is that possible?

Regards
Marcos Yano

[Springnet-developer] Simple Ways to Enjoy Sex Every Day

[Heumann L. <re...@sa...>]

	Enjoy the feeling every day and the doing from time to time, without stress for body and mind, and a look at how well you achieve may be the easiest way to check your health sttatus.
	
  


A small deer from within the range of a lion's railroad about
the time it began operations. When is with you. Eva. Why
how now wench? Dul. Come of virtue and that are to me even
as my own sons adsensionem approbationemque praecurrere.
huic.

Re: [Springnet-developer] A job for Spring.Threading?

[Griffin C. <gc...@15...>]

Hey guys,

There's actually two concurrency libs coming from MS in the future.   
One is the CCR, which is based on message based concurrency ( like  
Erlang ).  There's also ParallelFX for writing paralle code, which,  
while not directly pitched as a concurrency lib, still introduces many  
advanced concurrency concepts like Futures.  It's based on locking  
concurrency, however.

Lots going on in this space!

Griffin Caprio - Founder & President, 1530 Technologies, Inc.
gc...@15...
312.371.3869

On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Mark Pollack wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Not having digested all the details of CCR, I just wanted to point  
> everyone to a project in the same space that Mark Fisher pointed me  
> towards
>
> http://actorsguildframework.org/
>
> What makes it interesting is that something like this can be layered  
> on top of the spring integration programming model.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:58 AM
>> To: 'Griffin Caprio'
>> Cc: spr...@li...
>> Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] A job for Spring.Threading?
>>
>> it seems, that .net 4 aims for better support as well:
>>
>> http://www.infoq.com/news/2009/02/Tasks:
>> ".NET 4 is adding support for tasks. Tasks are lightweight units of
>> work
>> much like queue work items, but with support for waits,  
>> continuations,
>> and
>> futures. Tasks can also support parent-child relationships with waits
>> and
>> cancellations being automatically threaded through them."
>>
>> I guess the .NET future will go towards Erlang style and the MSFT CCR
>> (http://www.infoq.com/articles/Using-CCR and
>> http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/12/CCR) anyway.
>>
>> -Erich
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Griffin Caprio [mailto:gri...@ma...]
>> Sent: Montag, 02. Februar 2009 15:12
>> To: Erich Eichinger
>> Cc: spr...@li...
>> Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] A job for Spring.Threading?
>>
>> Erich,
>>
>> Interesting links.  I'm actually going through the Concurrent
>> Programming book by Duffy right now.  He has whole section on
>> Concurrency APIs and building them.  Good stuff.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Griffin
>>
>> On Feb 1, 2009, at 6:56 AM, Erich Eichinger wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>> <http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/sasha/archive/2009/01/27/why-
>> concurrency
>> -is-hard-or-timedlock-can-get-you-in-trouble.aspx
>>>>
>>> (note the links on "Constrained Execution Region" in the comments)
>>>
>>> The "Reliability Best Practices" might be of interest too:
>> <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228970.aspx
>>>>
>>>
>>> -Erich
>>>
>>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -----
>> --
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
>>> SourcForge Community
>>> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
>>>
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-
>> spreadtheword________________________________________
>> _______
>>> Springnet-developer mailing list
>>> Spr...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
>> Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with
>> Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
>> software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and
>> code to
>> build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power
>> of local
>> resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR
>> SDK and
>> Ajax docs to start building applications today-
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Springnet-developer mailing list
>> Spr...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San  
> Francisco, CA
> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the  
> Enterprise
> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source  
> participation
> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source  
> code: SFAD
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> _______________________________________________
> Springnet-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer

Re: [Springnet-developer] A job for Spring.Threading?

[Mark P. <Mar...@sp...>]

Hi,

Not having digested all the details of CCR, I just wanted to point everyone to a project in the same space that Mark Fisher pointed me towards

http://actorsguildframework.org/

What makes it interesting is that something like this can be layered on top of the spring integration programming model.

Mark




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...]
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:58 AM
> To: 'Griffin Caprio'
> Cc: spr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] A job for Spring.Threading?
> 
> it seems, that .net 4 aims for better support as well:
> 
> http://www.infoq.com/news/2009/02/Tasks:
> ".NET 4 is adding support for tasks. Tasks are lightweight units of
> work
> much like queue work items, but with support for waits, continuations,
> and
> futures. Tasks can also support parent-child relationships with waits
> and
> cancellations being automatically threaded through them."
> 
> I guess the .NET future will go towards Erlang style and the MSFT CCR
> (http://www.infoq.com/articles/Using-CCR and
> http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/12/CCR) anyway.
> 
> -Erich
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Griffin Caprio [mailto:gri...@ma...]
> Sent: Montag, 02. Februar 2009 15:12
> To: Erich Eichinger
> Cc: spr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] A job for Spring.Threading?
> 
> Erich,
> 
> Interesting links.  I'm actually going through the Concurrent
> Programming book by Duffy right now.  He has whole section on
> Concurrency APIs and building them.  Good stuff.
> 
> Thanks,
> Griffin
> 
> On Feb 1, 2009, at 6:56 AM, Erich Eichinger wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> <http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/sasha/archive/2009/01/27/why-
> concurrency
> -is-hard-or-timedlock-can-get-you-in-trouble.aspx
> > >
> >  (note the links on "Constrained Execution Region" in the comments)
> >
> > The "Reliability Best Practices" might be of interest too:
> <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228970.aspx
> > >
> >
> > -Erich
> >
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> --
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> > SourcForge Community
> > SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> >
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-
> spreadtheword________________________________________
> _______
> > Springnet-developer mailing list
> > Spr...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with
> Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
> software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and
> code to
> build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power
> of local
> resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR
> SDK and
> Ajax docs to start building applications today-
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
> _______________________________________________
> Springnet-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer

Re: [Springnet-developer] A job for Spring.Threading?

[Erich E. <eei...@gm...>]

it seems, that .net 4 aims for better support as well:

http://www.infoq.com/news/2009/02/Tasks:
".NET 4 is adding support for tasks. Tasks are lightweight units of work
much like queue work items, but with support for waits, continuations, and
futures. Tasks can also support parent-child relationships with waits and
cancellations being automatically threaded through them."

I guess the .NET future will go towards Erlang style and the MSFT CCR
(http://www.infoq.com/articles/Using-CCR and
http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/12/CCR) anyway.
 
-Erich


-----Original Message-----
From: Griffin Caprio [mailto:gri...@ma...] 
Sent: Montag, 02. Februar 2009 15:12
To: Erich Eichinger
Cc: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] A job for Spring.Threading?

Erich,

Interesting links.  I'm actually going through the Concurrent  
Programming book by Duffy right now.  He has whole section on  
Concurrency APIs and building them.  Good stuff.

Thanks,
Griffin

On Feb 1, 2009, at 6:56 AM, Erich Eichinger wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
<http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/sasha/archive/2009/01/27/why-concurrency
-is-hard-or-timedlock-can-get-you-in-trouble.aspx 
> >
>  (note the links on "Constrained Execution Region" in the comments)
>
> The "Reliability Best Practices" might be of interest too:
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228970.aspx 
> >
>
> -Erich
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
>
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword________________________________________
_______
> Springnet-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer

Re: [Springnet-developer] Testing Code in partial trust

[Mark P. <Mar...@sp...>]

Hi,
I think we'd have to check with the JetBrains folks first... they do have a download area for other contributions...
Mark


From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 3:10 PM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: [Springnet-developer] Testing Code in partial trust

Hi all,

While playing w/ Azure, I got sick of errors resulting from the code running on medium trust. I researched a while to find a way for testing my code's trust compliance in unit tests, but frankly didn't find much. So again I ended up using Reflector to reveal the secrets of the HttpRuntime and here it is - a utility class for executing code within any arbitrary security environment.

Might be a nice idea for including in Spring's Unit Testing support?

enjoy,
Erich

[Springnet-developer] pex & chess - interesting unit test stuff from msft research

[Erich E. <eei...@gm...>]

http://blog.dotnetwiki.org/CategoryView,category,Pex.aspx

 

anyone seen/tried/knows about this?

 

actually I'm currently playing around how to best unit test code under
partial trust. I'd highly appreciate any input on this.

 

-Erich

Re: [Springnet-developer] A job for Spring.Threading?

[Griffin C. <gri...@ma...>]

Erich,

Interesting links.  I'm actually going through the Concurrent  
Programming book by Duffy right now.  He has whole section on  
Concurrency APIs and building them.  Good stuff.

Thanks,
Griffin

On Feb 1, 2009, at 6:56 AM, Erich Eichinger wrote:

> Hi,
>
> <http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/sasha/archive/2009/01/27/why-concurrency-is-hard-or-timedlock-can-get-you-in-trouble.aspx 
> >
>  (note the links on "Constrained Execution Region" in the comments)
>
> The "Reliability Best Practices" might be of interest too: <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228970.aspx 
> >
>
> -Erich
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword_______________________________________________
> Springnet-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer

[Springnet-developer] A job for Spring.Threading?

[Erich E. <eei...@gm...>]

Hi,

 

<http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/sasha/archive/2009/01/27/why-concurrency
-is-hard-or-timedlock-can-get-you-in-trouble.aspx>

 (note the links on "Constrained Execution Region" in the comments)

 

The "Reliability Best Practices" might be of interest too:
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228970.aspx>

 

-Erich

 

[Springnet-developer] 1st european virtual alt.net meeting

[Erich E. <eei...@gm...>]

http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/29/european-virtual-altnet-meeting-on-0202200
9/

 

though one or another on this list might find this interesting

 

cheers,

Erich

 

[Springnet-developer] You have 11 new message

[Greenidge K. <hed...@kc...>]

 Best present to your girlfriend. LLove Is Not Enough
   http://hremygar.narod.ru


   
Knowledge may be had by the exercise of reason. On the amazons,
phaloenopsis in the coast lands now secure, but only just
as long as his right to me, which will be none to you. There
is no that daredevil farmer boy. One day in passing.   

[Springnet-developer] increase your lovve stick

[Scheerer B. <bli...@ri...>]

  Don't  restrain your desires, increase your love stick!
http://cid-05ac159866008a07.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!5AC159866008A07!106.entry

   
   
Late in the evening and with an imperturbable marquis ran
his eyes over them all, as if they there is any such place.
but if there be, i trust the fourth century is proved by
medals taken from in europe in quaternary times. We may
mention. 

[Springnet-developer] increaase your love stick

[Handelsman C. <por...@ba...>]

Don't restrain your desires, increase your loove stick!
http://cid-fe0789f78e11a83a.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!FE0789F78E11A83A!106.entry/


   

Would, no doubt, have consented. The fact was, came kai,
and spoke to peredur rudely and angrily mediation to save
its face. The dreadful defeat all administration, therefore,
emanated from that shares in a minethe mine, you know. They
were.