Re: [Springnet-developer] Spring.Net & shared hosting

[Mark P. <Mar...@co...>]

Hi,
=20
I think we should work to support this deployment environment even if we =
can get it working only for .NET 2.0. =20
=20
The GetCompiledPageInstance/CreateInstanceFromVirtualPath sounds like a =
simple change as does adding requirePermission=3D"false".    The file =
permission one sounds like it will require some investigation to have a =
general robust solutions, ie. not relying on X:\ being in the path.  For =
the last issue we can add the same assembly attribute as log4net does.  =
I wouldn't like to get into providing strongly and non-strongly signed =
assemblies in the release.
=20
I don't have experience testing permission-restricted assemblies but =
maybe we can work with the users get it going. =20
=20
Mark
=20

________________________________

From: spr...@li... on behalf of =
Erich Eichinger
Sent: Wed 10/25/2006 2:10 AM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: [Springnet-developer] Spring.Net & shared hosting



Obviously several people have troubles to run Spring.NET in a shared =
hosting environment.=20

http://forum.springframework.net/showthread.php?t=3D796 =
<http://forum.springframework.net/showthread.php?t=3D796>=20

Question: Do we want to support this? According to =
http://djeeg.blogspot.com/2006/08/working-around-shared-hosting.html =
<http://djeeg.blogspot.com/2006/08/working-around-shared-hosting.html>  =
the changes might be simple (at least for NET2.0) but I'm not sure how =
much effort really has to be taken.

Has anyone experience on how to test permission-restricted assemblies?

cheers,
Erich