Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out
Brought to you by:
aseovic,
markpollack
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out
|
From: Kenneth X. <KX...@bn...> - 2009-04-30 16:20:48
|
I usually do not use Trace.Debug as Common.Logging is my favorite :) I can certainly give it a try and let you know. BTW, thanks for the quick implementation of the in memory sink in Common.Logging 2.0. Hope I’m not asking too much :) but 1. It would be great if I can set the log level independently on each logger when unit testing 2. How about a separate sink for individual logger? I feel my assert against the log event is much cleaner that way. I did that for 1.2, you can take them if you want to make further modifications for 2.0. From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 11:47 AM To: Kenneth Xu; 'Mark Pollack'; spr...@li... Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out Great! Tx Kenneth for sharing your experience. I recently noticed Ayende complaining in twitter about not seeing any Trace.Debug() messages in DebugView when running NUnit 2.5 and thus switching to xUnit instead. Did you experience any similar issues? -Erich From: Kenneth Xu [mailto:KX...@bn...] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 5:38 PM To: Erich Eichinger; Mark Pollack; spr...@li... Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out Mark and Erich, Just to share my experience. I used NUnit 2.5 in the Spring.Data.Extension, which is mainly an extract of our enhancement to Spring working with ODP.Net. The parameterized test cases and generic support are great. TD.Net worked very. Here is an example that uses both generic and parameterized test cases. http://code.google.com/p/kennethxublogsource/source/browse/trunk/SpringExtension/test/Spring.Data.Extension.Tests/Data/Generic/ExtendedRowMapperResultSetExtractorTest.cs Cheers, Kenneth From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:32 AM To: 'Mark Pollack'; spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out Importance: Low TD.NET might detect NUnit extensions already. R#'s implementation of the runner is entirely decoupled from NUnit - they just look for attributes named "TestFixtureAttribute" and "TestAttribute" using reflection and string comparison and use their own testrunner implementation. I don't think R# 4.5 improved this. But think there are alternatives out there, I know for Gallio/MbUnit there are, which might be able to run nunit tests as well. I just need to upgrade the Nunitaspex stuff and we should be done. Although when we upgrade to nunit 2.5 for 1.2.1 we could upgrade logging as well then... - your turn ;-) -Erich From: Mark Pollack [mailto:Mar...@sp...] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:18 PM To: Eric Eichinger; spr...@li... Subject: RE: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out Hi, Cool. Sounds like it is time to take a look again at resharper etc., to see if they will detect NUnit extensions so we can get things like the ‘Spring TestContext Framework’ going – (weird name) http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/reference/testing.html#testcontext-framework Uses attributes instead of inheritance… I implemented a bit of this a long time ago but only the NUnit GUI runner still recognized the test fixture with a [ContextConfiguration] attribute… not Resharper or TestDriven.NET L I don’t see direct support for ordering of tests… still to unit testy focused….. Did I miss something? Mark From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:eei...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:22 AM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springnet-developer] fyi: nunit 2.5 RC is out seems to have some very interesting features including executing threaded tests, parameterized tests and better extensibility: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/altdotnet/message/21599 -Erich __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4041 (20090428) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. If you are not an intended recipient, please send an email immediately to pos...@bn... and take the steps necessary to delete the message completely from your computer system. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. If you are not an intended recipient, please send an email immediately to pos...@bn... and take the steps necessary to delete the message completely from your computer system. |
