|
From: Mark P. <mar...@sp...> - 2008-03-20 13:44:30
|
Hi, I'm in favor of this. This is the issue raised in http://jira.springframework.org/browse/SPRNET-540 Mark -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of Erich Eichinger Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 3:02 AM To: springnet-developer Subject: [Springnet-developer] "strict"-mode for ProxyFactoryObject throws on non-virtual methods Hi, a really common problem with proxying even for experienced developers is to forget marking methods as virtual or making them part of an interface. One of the recent examples is http://forum.springframework.net/showthread.php?p=11646#post11646 I'm thinking about introducing an optional "strict" mode for ProxyFactoryObject to have it throw an exception in case an object can't be proxied. any opinions or other suggestions? -Erich ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Springnet-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springnet-developer |
