|
From: Mark P. <Mar...@co...> - 2005-01-21 22:34:26
|
Hi,
=20
I was playing around with the JMX sandbox - very useful - and have a few =
questions Wasn't sure if I should post on the forum...but anyway...
=20
I couldn't get the MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler to work, when I tried =
to execute a managed operation I got "no result" shown in the MX4J http =
console, although only the methods I chose to expose were displayed. If =
I remove the usage of the metadata and rely on the reflection support - =
it all works fine but I'd like to only expose some of the methods in my =
class.
=20
Here is a code snip since I was doing this inside a helper class I =
already had for MX4J. Commenting out the metadata config code results =
in a happy app... :) =20
=20
=20
JmxMBeanAdapter adapter =3D new JmxMBeanAdapter();
adapter.setBeanFactory(beanFactory_);
adapter.setServer(mBeanServer_);
adapter.setBeans(beans_);
=20
//metadata config start
JmxAttributeSource attributesImpl =3D new =
CommonsAttributesJmxAttributeSource();
MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler ass =3D new =
MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler();
ass.setAttributeSource(attributesImpl);
MetadataNamingStrategy naming =3D new MetadataNamingStrategy();
naming.setAttributeSource(attributesImpl);
adapter.setAssembler(ass);
adapter.setNamingStrategy(naming);
//metadata config end
=20
LOG.info("Registering mbeans....");
adapter.afterPropertiesSet();
LOG.info("Done registering mbeans.");
=20
and I have added attributes such as
=20
/**
* =
@@org.springframework.jmx.metadata.support.ManagedResource(objectName=3D"=
TeamWork:Name=3DUserService", description=3D"User Management")
* =20
*/
public class HibernateUserService extends HibernateDaoSupport implements
UserService
=20
=20
/**
*=20
* =
@@org.springframework.jmx.metadata.support.ManagedOperation(description=3D=
"Create a user with a unique id")
*/
public User create(String uniqueName)
=20
=20
and the beans_ map contains an entry=20
<entry key=3D"TeamWork:Name=3DUserService"><ref =
bean=3D"UserService"/></entry>
with a log like this....
INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,359 =
[com.codestreet.application.jmx.DefaultAdapterFactoryBean] - Registering =
mbeans....
DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,671 =
[org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Bean Name: UserService has =
been autodetected for JMXification. Instantiating Now.
DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,671 =
[org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Bean with name: UserService =
is already registered for JMXification.
DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,906 =
[org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Located bean under key =
[TeamWork:Name=3DUserService] registering with JMX server.
DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,906 =
[org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Registering and Assembling =
MBean: TeamWork:Name=3DUserService
INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,937 =
[org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Registered MBean: =
TeamWork:Name=3DUserService
INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,937 =
[com.codestreet.application.jmx.DefaultAdapterFactoryBean] - Done =
registering mbeans.
=20
Another issue was that for some reason the commons-attributes compiler =
was changing the string TeamWork:Name=3DUserService to =
TeamWork.Name=3DUserService, replacing the colon with a period. Have =
you seen that?
=20
By way of extention has it been considered to add support for decribing =
method parameters in the operation attribute and relaying that info to =
the modelmbean?
=20
Thanks any help...
=20
Cheers,
Mark
=20
=20
=20
=20
=20
=20
=20
=20
|
|
From: Rob H. <ro...@ca...> - 2005-01-23 16:39:24
|
Mark,
It seems that you are using a fairly old version of JMX - a lot of the
class names are now different, but I don't think that is the problem.
I've put some time aside next week to really polish up JMX support and
perform a lot of testing on different platforms. I'll get you an answer
on this during the week.
Rob
Mark Pollack wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was playing around with the JMX sandbox - very useful - and have a few questions Wasn't sure if I should post on the forum...but anyway...
>
>I couldn't get the MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler to work, when I tried to execute a managed operation I got "no result" shown in the MX4J http console, although only the methods I chose to expose were displayed. If I remove the usage of the metadata and rely on the reflection support - it all works fine but I'd like to only expose some of the methods in my class.
>
>Here is a code snip since I was doing this inside a helper class I already had for MX4J. Commenting out the metadata config code results in a happy app... :)
>
>
> JmxMBeanAdapter adapter = new JmxMBeanAdapter();
> adapter.setBeanFactory(beanFactory_);
> adapter.setServer(mBeanServer_);
> adapter.setBeans(beans_);
>
>//metadata config start
>
> JmxAttributeSource attributesImpl = new CommonsAttributesJmxAttributeSource();
> MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler ass = new MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler();
> ass.setAttributeSource(attributesImpl);
> MetadataNamingStrategy naming = new MetadataNamingStrategy();
> naming.setAttributeSource(attributesImpl);
> adapter.setAssembler(ass);
> adapter.setNamingStrategy(naming);
>
>//metadata config end
>
> LOG.info("Registering mbeans....");
> adapter.afterPropertiesSet();
> LOG.info("Done registering mbeans.");
>
>and I have added attributes such as
>
>/**
> * @@org.springframework.jmx.metadata.support.ManagedResource(objectName="TeamWork:Name=UserService", description="User Management")
> *
> */
>public class HibernateUserService extends HibernateDaoSupport implements
> UserService
>
>
> /**
> *
> * @@org.springframework.jmx.metadata.support.ManagedOperation(description="Create a user with a unique id")
> */
> public User create(String uniqueName)
>
>
>and the beans_ map contains an entry
><entry key="TeamWork:Name=UserService"><ref bean="UserService"/></entry>
>
>with a log like this....
>
>INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,359 [com.codestreet.application.jmx.DefaultAdapterFactoryBean] - Registering mbeans....
>
>DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,671 [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Bean Name: UserService has been autodetected for JMXification. Instantiating Now.
>
>DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,671 [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Bean with name: UserService is already registered for JMXification.
>
>DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,906 [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Located bean under key [TeamWork:Name=UserService] registering with JMX server.
>
>DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,906 [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Registering and Assembling MBean: TeamWork:Name=UserService
>
>INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,937 [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Registered MBean: TeamWork:Name=UserService
>
>INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,937 [com.codestreet.application.jmx.DefaultAdapterFactoryBean] - Done registering mbeans.
>
>
>
>Another issue was that for some reason the commons-attributes compiler was changing the string TeamWork:Name=UserService to TeamWork.Name=UserService, replacing the colon with a period. Have you seen that?
>
>By way of extention has it been considered to add support for decribing method parameters in the operation attribute and relaying that info to the modelmbean?
>
>Thanks any help...
>
>Cheers,
>Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
>Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
>by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
>Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
>_______________________________________________
>Springframework-developer mailing list
>Spr...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
>
>
|
|
From: Rob H. <ro...@ca...> - 2005-01-25 11:44:09
|
Mark,
I guess this is a stupid question, but you did compile the Commons
Attributes stuff? I ran all the tests against MX4J and they seems to run
fine - including the method invocation ones.
Rob
Rob Harrop wrote:
> Mark,
>
> It seems that you are using a fairly old version of JMX - a lot of the
> class names are now different, but I don't think that is the problem.
> I've put some time aside next week to really polish up JMX support and
> perform a lot of testing on different platforms. I'll get you an
> answer on this during the week.
>
> Rob
>
> Mark Pollack wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was playing around with the JMX sandbox - very useful - and have a
>> few questions Wasn't sure if I should post on the forum...but anyway...
>>
>> I couldn't get the MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler to work, when I
>> tried to execute a managed operation I got "no result" shown in the
>> MX4J http console, although only the methods I chose to expose were
>> displayed. If I remove the usage of the metadata and rely on the
>> reflection support - it all works fine but I'd like to only expose
>> some of the methods in my class.
>>
>> Here is a code snip since I was doing this inside a helper class I
>> already had for MX4J. Commenting out the metadata config code
>> results in a happy app... :)
>>
>> JmxMBeanAdapter adapter = new JmxMBeanAdapter();
>> adapter.setBeanFactory(beanFactory_);
>> adapter.setServer(mBeanServer_);
>> adapter.setBeans(beans_);
>> //metadata config start
>>
>> JmxAttributeSource attributesImpl = new
>> CommonsAttributesJmxAttributeSource();
>> MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler ass = new
>> MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler();
>> ass.setAttributeSource(attributesImpl);
>> MetadataNamingStrategy naming = new MetadataNamingStrategy();
>> naming.setAttributeSource(attributesImpl);
>> adapter.setAssembler(ass);
>> adapter.setNamingStrategy(naming);
>>
>> //metadata config end
>> LOG.info("Registering mbeans....");
>> adapter.afterPropertiesSet();
>> LOG.info("Done registering mbeans.");
>>
>> and I have added attributes such as
>>
>> /**
>> *
>> @@org.springframework.jmx.metadata.support.ManagedResource(objectName="TeamWork:Name=UserService",
>> description="User Management")
>> * */
>> public class HibernateUserService extends HibernateDaoSupport implements
>> UserService
>>
>>
>> /**
>> * *
>> @@org.springframework.jmx.metadata.support.ManagedOperation(description="Create
>> a user with a unique id")
>> */
>> public User create(String uniqueName)
>>
>>
>> and the beans_ map contains an entry <entry
>> key="TeamWork:Name=UserService"><ref bean="UserService"/></entry>
>>
>> with a log like this....
>>
>> INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,359
>> [com.codestreet.application.jmx.DefaultAdapterFactoryBean] -
>> Registering mbeans....
>>
>> DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,671
>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Bean Name: UserService
>> has been autodetected for JMXification. Instantiating Now.
>>
>> DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,671
>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Bean with name:
>> UserService is already registered for JMXification.
>>
>> DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,906
>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Located bean under key
>> [TeamWork:Name=UserService] registering with JMX server.
>>
>> DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,906
>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Registering and
>> Assembling MBean: TeamWork:Name=UserService
>>
>> INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,937
>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Registered MBean:
>> TeamWork:Name=UserService
>>
>> INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,937
>> [com.codestreet.application.jmx.DefaultAdapterFactoryBean] - Done
>> registering mbeans.
>>
>>
>>
>> Another issue was that for some reason the commons-attributes
>> compiler was changing the string TeamWork:Name=UserService to
>> TeamWork.Name=UserService, replacing the colon with a period. Have
>> you seen that?
>>
>> By way of extention has it been considered to add support for
>> decribing method parameters in the operation attribute and relaying
>> that info to the modelmbean?
>>
>> Thanks any help...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
>> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
>> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
>> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
>> _______________________________________________
>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>> Spr...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
|
|
From: Rob H. <ro...@ca...> - 2005-01-25 12:35:15
|
Actually ignore that - I have managed to reproduce this in a test - I'll
look into it a bit more.
Rob
Rob Harrop wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I guess this is a stupid question, but you did compile the Commons
> Attributes stuff? I ran all the tests against MX4J and they seems to
> run fine - including the method invocation ones.
>
> Rob
>
> Rob Harrop wrote:
>
>> Mark,
>>
>> It seems that you are using a fairly old version of JMX - a lot of
>> the class names are now different, but I don't think that is the
>> problem. I've put some time aside next week to really polish up JMX
>> support and perform a lot of testing on different platforms. I'll get
>> you an answer on this during the week.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> Mark Pollack wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was playing around with the JMX sandbox - very useful - and have a
>>> few questions Wasn't sure if I should post on the forum...but
>>> anyway...
>>>
>>> I couldn't get the MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler to work, when I
>>> tried to execute a managed operation I got "no result" shown in the
>>> MX4J http console, although only the methods I chose to expose were
>>> displayed. If I remove the usage of the metadata and rely on the
>>> reflection support - it all works fine but I'd like to only expose
>>> some of the methods in my class.
>>>
>>> Here is a code snip since I was doing this inside a helper class I
>>> already had for MX4J. Commenting out the metadata config code
>>> results in a happy app... :)
>>> JmxMBeanAdapter adapter = new JmxMBeanAdapter();
>>> adapter.setBeanFactory(beanFactory_);
>>> adapter.setServer(mBeanServer_);
>>> adapter.setBeans(beans_);
>>> //metadata config start
>>>
>>> JmxAttributeSource attributesImpl = new
>>> CommonsAttributesJmxAttributeSource();
>>> MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler ass = new
>>> MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler();
>>> ass.setAttributeSource(attributesImpl);
>>> MetadataNamingStrategy naming = new MetadataNamingStrategy();
>>> naming.setAttributeSource(attributesImpl);
>>> adapter.setAssembler(ass);
>>> adapter.setNamingStrategy(naming);
>>>
>>> //metadata config end
>>> LOG.info("Registering mbeans....");
>>> adapter.afterPropertiesSet();
>>> LOG.info("Done registering mbeans.");
>>>
>>> and I have added attributes such as
>>>
>>> /**
>>> *
>>> @@org.springframework.jmx.metadata.support.ManagedResource(objectName="TeamWork:Name=UserService",
>>> description="User Management")
>>> * */
>>> public class HibernateUserService extends HibernateDaoSupport
>>> implements
>>> UserService
>>>
>>>
>>> /**
>>> * *
>>> @@org.springframework.jmx.metadata.support.ManagedOperation(description="Create
>>> a user with a unique id")
>>> */
>>> public User create(String uniqueName)
>>>
>>>
>>> and the beans_ map contains an entry <entry
>>> key="TeamWork:Name=UserService"><ref bean="UserService"/></entry>
>>>
>>> with a log like this....
>>>
>>> INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,359
>>> [com.codestreet.application.jmx.DefaultAdapterFactoryBean] -
>>> Registering mbeans....
>>>
>>> DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,671
>>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Bean Name: UserService
>>> has been autodetected for JMXification. Instantiating Now.
>>>
>>> DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,671
>>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Bean with name:
>>> UserService is already registered for JMXification.
>>>
>>> DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,906
>>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Located bean under key
>>> [TeamWork:Name=UserService] registering with JMX server.
>>>
>>> DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,906
>>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Registering and
>>> Assembling MBean: TeamWork:Name=UserService
>>>
>>> INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,937
>>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Registered MBean:
>>> TeamWork:Name=UserService
>>>
>>> INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,937
>>> [com.codestreet.application.jmx.DefaultAdapterFactoryBean] - Done
>>> registering mbeans.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Another issue was that for some reason the commons-attributes
>>> compiler was changing the string TeamWork:Name=UserService to
>>> TeamWork.Name=UserService, replacing the colon with a period. Have
>>> you seen that?
>>>
>>> By way of extention has it been considered to add support for
>>> decribing method parameters in the operation attribute and relaying
>>> that info to the modelmbean?
>>>
>>> Thanks any help...
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
>>> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
>>> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
>>> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>>> Spr...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
>> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
>> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
>> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
>> _______________________________________________
>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>> Spr...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>
>>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
|
|
From: Rob H. <ro...@ca...> - 2005-01-25 14:18:09
|
Mark,
Just committed a fix to this. I guess I made the mistake of testing
against the reference implementation when MX4J is actually a more
accurate implementation ;). The problem was the default cache was set to
never stale and so MX4J will always use its cached value which is
unfortunately null. I set the default cached value to be -1 which is
always stale (no caching). You can change this with the
currencyTimeLimit property of the ManagedOperation attribute.
Regarding parameter information - that is a really good idea. The only
problem I foresee is that configuration will unwieldy and index-based
since it is impossible to get parameter names at runtime using reflection.
Rob
Rob Harrop wrote:
> Actually ignore that - I have managed to reproduce this in a test -
> I'll look into it a bit more.
>
> Rob
>
> Rob Harrop wrote:
>
>> Mark,
>>
>> I guess this is a stupid question, but you did compile the Commons
>> Attributes stuff? I ran all the tests against MX4J and they seems to
>> run fine - including the method invocation ones.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> Rob Harrop wrote:
>>
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> It seems that you are using a fairly old version of JMX - a lot of
>>> the class names are now different, but I don't think that is the
>>> problem. I've put some time aside next week to really polish up JMX
>>> support and perform a lot of testing on different platforms. I'll
>>> get you an answer on this during the week.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>> Mark Pollack wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I was playing around with the JMX sandbox - very useful - and have
>>>> a few questions Wasn't sure if I should post on the forum...but
>>>> anyway...
>>>>
>>>> I couldn't get the MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler to work, when I
>>>> tried to execute a managed operation I got "no result" shown in the
>>>> MX4J http console, although only the methods I chose to expose were
>>>> displayed. If I remove the usage of the metadata and rely on the
>>>> reflection support - it all works fine but I'd like to only expose
>>>> some of the methods in my class.
>>>>
>>>> Here is a code snip since I was doing this inside a helper class I
>>>> already had for MX4J. Commenting out the metadata config code
>>>> results in a happy app... :)
>>>> JmxMBeanAdapter adapter = new JmxMBeanAdapter();
>>>> adapter.setBeanFactory(beanFactory_);
>>>> adapter.setServer(mBeanServer_);
>>>> adapter.setBeans(beans_);
>>>> //metadata config start
>>>>
>>>> JmxAttributeSource attributesImpl = new
>>>> CommonsAttributesJmxAttributeSource();
>>>> MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler ass = new
>>>> MetadataModelMBeanInfoAssembler();
>>>> ass.setAttributeSource(attributesImpl);
>>>> MetadataNamingStrategy naming = new MetadataNamingStrategy();
>>>> naming.setAttributeSource(attributesImpl);
>>>> adapter.setAssembler(ass);
>>>> adapter.setNamingStrategy(naming);
>>>>
>>>> //metadata config end
>>>> LOG.info("Registering mbeans....");
>>>> adapter.afterPropertiesSet();
>>>> LOG.info("Done registering mbeans.");
>>>>
>>>> and I have added attributes such as
>>>>
>>>> /**
>>>> *
>>>> @@org.springframework.jmx.metadata.support.ManagedResource(objectName="TeamWork:Name=UserService",
>>>> description="User Management")
>>>> * */
>>>> public class HibernateUserService extends HibernateDaoSupport
>>>> implements
>>>> UserService
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /**
>>>> * *
>>>> @@org.springframework.jmx.metadata.support.ManagedOperation(description="Create
>>>> a user with a unique id")
>>>> */
>>>> public User create(String uniqueName)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and the beans_ map contains an entry <entry
>>>> key="TeamWork:Name=UserService"><ref bean="UserService"/></entry>
>>>>
>>>> with a log like this....
>>>>
>>>> INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,359
>>>> [com.codestreet.application.jmx.DefaultAdapterFactoryBean] -
>>>> Registering mbeans....
>>>>
>>>> DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,671
>>>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Bean Name: UserService
>>>> has been autodetected for JMXification. Instantiating Now.
>>>>
>>>> DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,671
>>>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Bean with name:
>>>> UserService is already registered for JMXification.
>>>>
>>>> DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,906
>>>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Located bean under key
>>>> [TeamWork:Name=UserService] registering with JMX server.
>>>>
>>>> DEBUG [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,906
>>>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Registering and
>>>> Assembling MBean: TeamWork:Name=UserService
>>>>
>>>> INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,937
>>>> [org.springframework.jmx.JmxMBeanAdapter] - Registered MBean:
>>>> TeamWork:Name=UserService
>>>>
>>>> INFO [main] 2005-01-21 17:26:01,937
>>>> [com.codestreet.application.jmx.DefaultAdapterFactoryBean] - Done
>>>> registering mbeans.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Another issue was that for some reason the commons-attributes
>>>> compiler was changing the string TeamWork:Name=UserService to
>>>> TeamWork.Name=UserService, replacing the colon with a period. Have
>>>> you seen that?
>>>>
>>>> By way of extention has it been considered to add support for
>>>> decribing method parameters in the operation attribute and relaying
>>>> that info to the modelmbean?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks any help...
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive
>>>> Reporting
>>>> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
>>>> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
>>>> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>>>> Spr...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
>>> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
>>> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
>>> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>>> Spr...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
>> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
>> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
>> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
>> _______________________________________________
>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>> Spr...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>
>>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
|