Thread: [Springframework-developer] ActiveSOAP

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Anybody take alook at this yet?

http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/2004/09/21.html#a506

Are there any plans to provide ActiveSOAP support?

http://activesoap.codehaus.org/

Regards,
Dmitriy.

FWIW I'd like to try wrap up ActiveSOAP as a possible remoting solution 
for Spring. Plus ActiveSOAP's default configuration mechanism is gonna 
be Spring so the two frameworks should work nicely with each other.

On 5 Oct 2004, at 18:58, Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> Are there any plans to provide ActiveSOAP support?
>
> http://activesoap.codehaus.org/
>
> Regards,
> Dmitriy.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on 
> ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give 
> us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out 
> more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

James,

that would be very interesting to see. I'll look forward for that!

jas...@ma... wrote:

> FWIW I'd like to try wrap up ActiveSOAP as a possible remoting 
> solution for Spring. Plus ActiveSOAP's default configuration mechanism 
> is gonna be Spring so the two frameworks should work nicely with each 
> other.
>
> On 5 Oct 2004, at 18:58, Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
>
>> Are there any plans to provide ActiveSOAP support?
>>
>> http://activesoap.codehaus.org/
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dmitriy.
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
>> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. 
>> Give us
>> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find 
>> out more
>> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
>> _______________________________________________
>> Springframework-developer mailing list
>> Spr...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>>
>>
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out 
> more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer

James,

just out of curiosity - any progress on AS/Spring integration?

Regards,
Dmitriy.

On 5 Nov 2004, at 13:31, Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> James,
>
> just out of curiosity - any progress on AS/Spring integration?

We've made some progress, albeit indirectly. We've got JMS message 
driven bean stuff working in Spring via the JCA container. We've got 
JMS based remoting working reasonably well.

Now currently ActiveSOAP doesn't particularly require Spring or have 
any Spring related demos;. The whole of the Active* stack is developed 
to drop nicely into Spring; so I don't see any particular change 
required in ActiveSOAP to work nicely in Spring. For ActiveSOAP for 
example, I see Spring as the ideal container/glue/framework to wire 
together handlers, transports and pipelines.  Similar kinds of things 
are being done at the moment in the straight JMS type worlds too. Ditto 
for remoting.

So I see the 3 different things kinda merging together somewhat; using 
Spring to wire remoting and JMS / SOAP messaging stuff together. We're 
pretty much there right now, though the current missing piece is to use 
ActiveSOAP as a web service based remoting layer in Spring. Given how 
easy it was to add JMS remoting to Spring, it'll be similarly easy for 
ActiveSOAP.

I'm hopeful that it'll be all sorted (including polishing off the JMS 
remoting in Spring) in the next 1-2 weeks, day-job allowing. As an 
aside, we've a customer using ActiveSOAP who wants closer integration 
with JMX; so the ActiveSOAP <-> Spring integration might get improved 
fairly quickly while reusing Spring's JMX support too... (which all the 
Active* stack could use better JMX integration, hopefully via Spring to 
avoid too much JMX muck in the code).

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

James,

thanks for the info ;-)

Dmitriy.

jas...@ma... wrote:

> On 5 Nov 2004, at 13:31, Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
>
>> James,
>>
>> just out of curiosity - any progress on AS/Spring integration?
>
>
> We've made some progress, albeit indirectly. We've got JMS message 
> driven bean stuff working in Spring via the JCA container. We've got 
> JMS based remoting working reasonably well.
>
> Now currently ActiveSOAP doesn't particularly require Spring or have 
> any Spring related demos;. The whole of the Active* stack is developed 
> to drop nicely into Spring; so I don't see any particular change 
> required in ActiveSOAP to work nicely in Spring. For ActiveSOAP for 
> example, I see Spring as the ideal container/glue/framework to wire 
> together handlers, transports and pipelines.  Similar kinds of things 
> are being done at the moment in the straight JMS type worlds too. 
> Ditto for remoting.
>
> So I see the 3 different things kinda merging together somewhat; using 
> Spring to wire remoting and JMS / SOAP messaging stuff together. We're 
> pretty much there right now, though the current missing piece is to 
> use ActiveSOAP as a web service based remoting layer in Spring. Given 
> how easy it was to add JMS remoting to Spring, it'll be similarly easy 
> for ActiveSOAP.
>
> I'm hopeful that it'll be all sorted (including polishing off the JMS 
> remoting in Spring) in the next 1-2 weeks, day-job allowing. As an 
> aside, we've a customer using ActiveSOAP who wants closer integration 
> with JMX; so the ActiveSOAP <-> Spring integration might get improved 
> fairly quickly while reusing Spring's JMX support too... (which all 
> the Active* stack could use better JMX integration, hopefully via 
> Spring to avoid too much JMX muck in the code).
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
> LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer