|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-04-20 21:58:55
|
Everybody, =20 I've just committed the name change in the AOP package that we've = discussed a while ago, namely AbstractPrototypeTargetSource -> = AbstractPrototypeBasedTargetSource. =20 There's still two further minor enhancements that I'd like to look at, = so the question is how urgent 1.0.1 actually is. We've got two options: = either release 1.0.1 tomorrow evening, with everything that's in CVS by = then, or release it early next week, with those further issues addressed = too. Of course, new issues might get reported in the meantime again, so = I'm somewhat inclined to still release 1.0.1 tomorrow, and do a 1.0.2 = release in a couple of weeks. =20 I'd like to clarify the JdbcUtils.extractDatabaseMetaData issue in any = case for 1.0.1, as we need to get that released API right. =20 Juergen |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-04-20 22:34:46
|
I'm for tomorrow night, as the Hibernate sesson binding bug has been=20 sitting around in the released version for a long time now, and somebody=20 might get burned by it in production. But if other people want to delay,=20 it's not the end of the world. j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: >Everybody, >=20 >I've just committed the name change in the AOP package that we've discus= sed a while ago, namely AbstractPrototypeTargetSource -> AbstractPrototyp= eBasedTargetSource. >=20 >There's still two further minor enhancements that I'd like to look at, s= o the question is how urgent 1.0.1 actually is. We've got two options: ei= ther release 1.0.1 tomorrow evening, with everything that's in CVS by the= n, or release it early next week, with those further issues addressed too= . Of course, new issues might get reported in the meantime again, so I'm = somewhat inclined to still release 1.0.1 tomorrow, and do a 1.0.2 release= in a couple of weeks. >=20 >I'd like to clarify the JdbcUtils.extractDatabaseMetaData issue in any c= ase for 1.0.1, as we need to get that released API right. >=20 >Juergen > =20 > |
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@tr...> - 2004-04-21 01:22:30
|
I'm fine with a release tomorrow. I have resolved the issues with DatabaseMetaDataCallbackHandler. Thomas jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >Everybody, > >I've just committed the name change in the AOP package that we've discussed a while ago, namely AbstractPrototypeTargetSource -> AbstractPrototypeBasedTargetSource. > >There's still two further minor enhancements that I'd like to look at, so the question is how urgent 1.0.1 actually is. We've got two options: either release 1.0.1 tomorrow evening, with everything that's in CVS by then, or release it early next week, with those further issues addressed too. Of course, new issues might get reported in the meantime again, so I'm somewhat inclined to still release 1.0.1 tomorrow, and do a 1.0.2 release in a couple of weeks. > >I'd like to clarify the JdbcUtils.extractDatabaseMetaData issue in any case for 1.0.1, as we need to get that released API right. > >Juergen > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of >GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Springframework-developer mailing list >Spr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > > |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2004-04-21 18:45:19
|
If we're going to need 1.0.2 anyway, I'd say release 1.0.1 tonight. Otherwise, I would like to commit my CGLIB fix right away so we have a we= ek to test it in the wild before a 1.0.1 release next week. Ideally I'd feel more comfortable if we weren't changing things (even min= or stuff) so close to the release date. I'm keen on a code freeze of at leas= t a few days before each maintenance release. Regards, Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]" <jue...@we...> To: <spr...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 10:57 PM Subject: [Springframework-developer] Final preparations for 1.0.1 Everybody, I've just committed the name change in the AOP package that we've discuss= ed a while ago, namely AbstractPrototypeTargetSource -> AbstractPrototypeBasedTargetSource. There's still two further minor enhancements that I'd like to look at, so the question is how urgent 1.0.1 actually is. We've got two options: eith= er release 1.0.1 tomorrow evening, with everything that's in CVS by then, or release it early next week, with those further issues addressed too. Of course, new issues might get reported in the meantime again, so I'm somew= hat inclined to still release 1.0.1 tomorrow, and do a 1.0.2 release in a cou= ple of weeks. I'd like to clarify the JdbcUtils.extractDatabaseMetaData issue in any ca= se for 1.0.1, as we need to get that released API right. Juergen ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id638&op=3Dick _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |