I am ok with the Mar. 1 date, but on my part that means I probably can
not help with the release in almost any capacity. I have a big deadline
on Feb. 26th, another on Mar. 12, and an unchangeable 9 day vacation in
the middle of those 2 dates, so for the last 2-3 weeks have been and for
the next 3-4 weeks will be basically in burn mode to try to produce code
for work...
However, I will try to do the EJB section. What have people finally
ended up using for a DocBook editor?
Regards,
Colin
jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote:
>Dear Spring developers,
>
>After a few minor bugfixes and modifications after 1.0 RC1, we are now ready to concentrate on 1.0 final. So I suggest *March 1st* as target date for the 1.0 final release! I won't be worried if some parts of the docs aren't completely finished by then, as we can always complete them afterwards.
>
>As discussed in other recent mails, we should concentrate on fixing bugs and completing documentation. Minor feature enhancements are OK from my point of view; however, they should be delayed till 1.1 if they are beyond trivial. We should avoid the need for an RC2 if possible; after all, there's a life after Spring 1.0 final :-)
>
>Some things remain to be clarified for 1.0, namely the AOP Alliance version that we ship, and updating to the most current Commons Attributes snapshot. All other dependencies are up-to-date as far as I see; updating to Ant 1.6.1 is hardly worth mentioning. On the occasion, it would be good if CGLIB 2.0 went final in time.
>
>We should also avoid double documentation in the distribution, i.e. remove the separate HTML documents in the docs directory as soon as all the info in there is also available in the reference documentation. I'm happy if someone does a cleanup in there promptly; I intend to browse through it again myself before the actual release.
>
>So, next stop: 1.0 final - March 1st!
>
>
|
