Menu
▾
▴
springframework-developer
|
From: Kopylenko, D. <dko...@ac...> - 2003-11-06 13:31:48
|
Tim, everyone, I've just committed the change to JavaMailSenderImpl. Now it's possible to set the 'port' property and if not explicitly set, it uses the default one i.e. -1 is used, as specified in JavaDoc for javax.mail.Service class. Regards, Dmitriy. -----Original Message----- From: Kopylenko, Dmitry [mailto:dko...@ac...] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 7:49 AM To: 'spr...@li...' Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Request to add "port" to JavaMail SenderImpl settings Rod, Alef, Tim I just saw it :-) I can take a look or Alef, do you want to do it? Regards, Dmitriy -----Original Message----- From: Rod Johnson [mailto:rod...@in...] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:55 AM To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Request to add "port" to JavaMailSenderImpl settings Tim, I've just drawn Dmitriy's attention to your SF request this morning :-) Regards, Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim McAuley" <ti...@mo...> To: <spr...@li...> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:47 AM Subject: [Springframework-developer] Request to add "port" to JavaMailSenderImpl settings > Hi, > > I was wondering if it could be possible to add a > setPort() method to the JavaMailSenderImpl class. > > This would allow for sending email via a mail server > which does not use the standard port of 25. I have > looked at the code and all it should require is a new > setting to be added for the port and the > Transport.connect() call modified. > > I have placed a request on sourceforge for this at > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=73357&atid=537542 > (not sure if theses sourceforge facilities are used much). > > Thanks, > > Tim > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-11-07 00:38:16
|
New version of the PDF is in the CVS (root of the docs directory). It seems that DocBook is going to be it, having good results here and am also able to customize stuff if I want, so I'm pretty happy. About the image stuff (thomas?) in HTML, I've been able to produce quite reasonable html so that's no problem as well... No images yet in the spring pdf though... I've basically finished the beans package (apart form some - for me - minor things like event handling and vetoing) but am not quite satisfied yet about the form. I'll probably have to elaborate some more on some pieces. We'll have to see how it works when writing more documentation (because the baens package still is the basis for a lot of stuff and probably has to be referred to a lot)... I'll see what I can do tomorrow and over the weekend. I might check in the sources for the docs after the weekend (unless there's major objections). I'm planning one working on the context stuff next. Mail and valiation shouldn't be too much work. Anybody has other input that might prevent me from doing duplicate stuff? Alef |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-11-11 23:12:27
|
There's a new (WORK IN PROGRESS) pdf in the docs directory containing a more elaborate beans package chapter (still not satisfied with it) and some more info on mvc fileupload. It's about doubled in size and in pages I'm going to commit the sources I think in a couple of days (won't be tomorrow, but probable Thursday). I plan to put a reference directory in the docs directory, containing the sources and the libraries needed for generation of documentation. Then, there will be a build-time-generated pdf, html and html_single directory in the reference directory (basically it's taken from Hibernate, which is ok, if we mention them somewhere, according to Hib's Christian Bauer). There will be additional targets in the build.xml for generating html, html-single and pdf docs (just three or four targets). One point of concern, the reference directory will start with a size of ___11 MEGABYTES!!!___. This is quite huge already, and it's going to be bigger when pictures and more text comes in (but not a lot, because it's mainly the libraries that do it, fop=2mb, batik=2mb, jai=1,5mb, docbook-xsl=3,5mb). I'll omit the lib directory until further notice, unless everybody agrees to put the libs in as well... Alef P.s. I never really use the priorities in emails, but it's sure handy to indicate a not-so-important mail :).. P.p.s. don't mind the image in the beans-chapter having a strnage layout, still work-in-progress :) |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2003-11-11 23:25:40
|
Does anybody object to me changing the build to put all directories (and thus all artifacts) produced by the build to be under a top-level dir called 'target'? I don't find the present setup, with 'x' number of directories produced under the project root, to be too clean or very standard. |
|
From: Darren D. <da...@da...> - 2003-11-11 23:33:27
|
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 23:25, Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > Does anybody object to me changing the build to put all directories (and > thus all artifacts) produced by the build to be under a top-level dir > called 'target'? I don't find the present setup, with 'x' number of > directories produced under the project root, to be too clean or very > standard. +1 -- Darren Davison Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/key.jsp |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-11-12 08:15:21
|
> Does anybody object to me changing the build to put all directories (and > thus all artifacts) produced by the build to be under a top-level dir > called 'target'? I don't find the present setup, with 'x' number of > directories produced under the project root, to be too clean or very > standard. Good idea. |
