|
From: Rong Ou <ro...@gm...> - 2004-09-09 17:57:35
|
Hi all, I noticed in 1.1 the JMS listener classes were removed from the original sandbox code. Is there another way to register a bean as a JMS listener? This is a bit of functionality that's actually quite useful for us. Is there a plan to add this back in or reimplement it? Thanks, Rong |
|
From: Dmitri M. <ma...@ma...> - 2004-09-09 18:42:31
Attachments:
smime.p7s
|
Hi Rong, I guess JMS functionality been merged into main 1.1 branch, isn't it? Rong Ou wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed in 1.1 the JMS listener classes were removed from the > original sandbox code. Is there another way to register a bean as a > JMS listener? This is a bit of functionality that's actually quite > useful for us. Is there a plan to add this back in or reimplement it? > > Thanks, > > Rong > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Rong Ou <ro...@gm...> - 2004-09-09 19:22:43
|
I know, it's just that the listener classes were removed. Those were used to register beans in an application context as JMS listeners. I was just wondering if/when these are going to be added back in, since they seem quite useful and not that hard to implement. Rong On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 14:41:45 -0400, Dmitri Maximovich <ma...@ma...> wrote: > Hi Rong, > > I guess JMS functionality been merged into main 1.1 branch, isn't it? > > > > Rong Ou wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I noticed in 1.1 the JMS listener classes were removed from the > > original sandbox code. Is there another way to register a bean as a > > JMS listener? This is a bit of functionality that's actually quite > > useful for us. Is there a plan to add this back in or reimplement it? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rong > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > Springframework-developer mailing list > > Spr...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > |
|
From: Mark P. <mar...@co...> - 2004-09-13 22:42:49
|
Hi, There are some factory bean classes in the sandbox for this. We decided = to remove it from the release since we wanted to wait to have subscription support akin to MDBs. You can find the documentation for this on the forums at http://forum.springframework.com/viewtopic.php?t=3D174&sid=3D0d8bcdcf3da0= 45714b1 09de0907cdc82 Cheers, Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: spr...@li...=20 > [mailto:spr...@li...] > On Behalf Of Rong Ou > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 3:23 PM > To: spr...@li... > Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] JMS message listeners >=20 >=20 > I know, it's just that the listener classes were removed.=20 > Those were used to register beans in an application context=20 > as JMS listeners. I was just wondering if/when these are=20 > going to be added back in, since they seem quite useful and=20 > not that hard to implement. >=20 > Rong >=20 > On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 14:41:45 -0400, Dmitri Maximovich=20 > <ma...@ma...> wrote: > > Hi Rong, > >=20 > > I guess JMS functionality been merged into main 1.1 branch,=20 > isn't it? > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > Rong Ou wrote: > >=20 > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I noticed in 1.1 the JMS listener classes were removed from the=20 > > > original sandbox code. Is there another way to register a=20 > bean as a=20 > > > JMS listener? This is a bit of functionality that's=20 > actually quite=20 > > > useful for us. Is there a plan to add this back in or reimplement=20 > > > it? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Rong > > > > > >=20 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be=20 > one of 170=20 > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for=20 > your judgement=20 > > > on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Springframework-developer mailing list > > > Spr...@li...=20 > > >=20 > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-d eveloper=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 = Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who = ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.=20 Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |