|
From: jbetancourt <jbe...@co...> - 2004-10-28 00:17:36
|
FishEye for Spring's Jira page? Just a thought. http://fisheye.thecortex.net/ |
|
From: Darren D. <da...@da...> - 2004-10-28 06:00:58
|
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 22:38, jbetancourt wrote: > FishEye for Spring's Jira page? Just a thought. > > http://fisheye.thecortex.net/ I think it's a CVS viewer isn't it? And AFAIK, there's no non commercial license. It does look like a very nice product though - some of the codehaus servers have it on a beta test. -- Darren Davison Public Key: #DD356B0D |
|
From: Matthew E. P. <mat...@me...> - 2004-10-28 14:46:40
|
According to the TSS announcement (http://theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=29560) , they do offer a free license for open source projects. http://www.cenqua.com/freelicenserequest!default.jspa Cheers, Matthew On Oct 28, 2004, at 1:00 AM, Darren Davison wrote: > On Wednesday 27 October 2004 22:38, jbetancourt wrote: >> FishEye for Spring's Jira page? Just a thought. >> >> http://fisheye.thecortex.net/ > > I think it's a CVS viewer isn't it? And AFAIK, there's no non > commercial > license. It does look like a very nice product though - some of the > codehaus servers have it on a beta test. > > -- > Darren Davison > Public Key: #DD356B0D > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE > LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Darren D. <da...@da...> - 2004-10-28 16:54:55
|
On Thu, October 28, 2004 15:46, Matthew E. Porter said: > According to the TSS announcement > (http://theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=3D29560) , they do > offer a free license for open source projects. > > http://www.cenqua.com/freelicenserequest!default.jspa cool. Definitely worth investigating then - is it something SF are willi= ng to install on their servers do you know? --=20 Darren Davison Public Key: #DD356B0D |
|
From: Matt Q. <ma...@ce...> - 2004-10-28 22:01:57
|
Hi guys, (FYI: I'm from Cenqua.) Firstly, I can confirm that we do give zero-cost licenses for FishEye to Open Source projects. Infact IIRC, you guys already have a license for Clover, one of our other products. > cool. Definitely worth investigating then - is it something SF are willing to > install on their servers do you know? If sf.net were willing to run FishEye alongside viewcvs, we would be more than happy to give sf.net a license to do so: for all projects at sf.net. We intend to apporach them about this, but having it requested directly by projects might make sf.net more willing to investigate it. Feel free to email sf.net asking that they look at installing FishEye. Having said that, there is one "hack" you can do to get FishEye running on your sf.net project. Simply run FishEye on your own server, and replicate the CVS repository to your own server using the nightly CVS tarball: http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=768&group_id=1#nightlytarballs Lastly, we do intend to eventually support pserver access in FishEye. However, it won't be the most performant way to access a CVS repository, and it is probably not a good idea to overload sf.net's already-overloaded CVS servers. =Matt Darren Davison wrote: > On Thu, October 28, 2004 15:46, Matthew E. Porter said: > >>According to the TSS announcement >>(http://theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=29560) , they do >>offer a free license for open source projects. >> >>http://www.cenqua.com/freelicenserequest!default.jspa > > > cool. Definitely worth investigating then - is it something SF are willing to > install on their servers do you know? > |
|
From: Darren D. <da...@da...> - 2004-10-28 22:31:59
|
On Thursday 28 October 2004 23:04, Matt Quail wrote: > Hi guys, > > (FYI: I'm from Cenqua.) Hi Matt - great looking product you guys have. > We intend to apporach them about this, but having it requested directly > by projects might make sf.net more willing to investigate it. Feel free > to email sf.net asking that they look at installing FishEye. OK, I can do that, but they're not quick to respond to stuff like this. I raised an official request for JDK installations on their compile farm servers back in July. I got a response earlier this week. I reckon they'll take more notice if you approached them - it would give them something of a better value proposition for attracting more users (and thereby higher advertising and sponsorship revenues) All the best, -- Darren Davison Public Key: #DD356B0D |