RE: [Springframework-developer] Explicit locales

[Trevor C. <tc...@in...>]

What you wrote sounded right, and I think I understand what you are planning
now, and it should workwell.  Its just a much different implementation than
what I was thinking, so my own preconceived ideas were clouding my ability
to see your idea.  Anyway, the working code should reveal all. :)

On a more general note:
>>BTW, the time before 1.0 is still our greatest chance to get 
>>it right, without the burden of backward compatibility.
I totally agree, but want to make sure that everyone is on the same page.
My understanding is that whatever we choose for our "0.8" or "early access"
release is not guarenteed to be compatible with our 1.0 release.  We
obviously want to encourage people to start developing with it, but we won't
be burdened by backwards compatibility to support it.  If, for example, we
discover a glaring hole in the code, we can change it for 1.0 even if it
breaks any applications coded against 0.8.  Is this correct?

Trevor D. Cook


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.456 / Virus Database: 256 - Release Date: 2/18/03