Re: [Springframework-rcp-dev] [Desktop] Opinions on JSR 295 and 296?

[Thomas R. C. <tho...@gm...>]

On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Kevin Day escreveu:
> I am wondering if anyone has any general thoughts on JSR 295 and 296.  My
> initial impression from working with 296 is that they have hit the nail
> directly on the head - but that it doesn't go quite far enough.  I think
> that 295 still has some details to work out (especially with where they
> incorporate validation), but their use of EL for certain binding
> definitions is very elegant in a lot of situations, and the underlying
> approach seems to be very intuitive (I am a user and fan of JGoodies
> bindings, but the learning curve can be steep).
>
> Just curious about where everyone sees this fitting into the Desktop
> project (if at all).

All I know is that the binding/validation of spring rcp as it stands seems to 
be vastly complicated and I'd prefer to go with standards.