|
From: Thomas R. C. <tho...@gm...> - 2008-07-07 18:32:20
|
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Kevin Day escreveu: > I am wondering if anyone has any general thoughts on JSR 295 and 296. My > initial impression from working with 296 is that they have hit the nail > directly on the head - but that it doesn't go quite far enough. I think > that 295 still has some details to work out (especially with where they > incorporate validation), but their use of EL for certain binding > definitions is very elegant in a lot of situations, and the underlying > approach seems to be very intuitive (I am a user and fan of JGoodies > bindings, but the learning curve can be steep). > > Just curious about where everyone sees this fitting into the Desktop > project (if at all). All I know is that the binding/validation of spring rcp as it stands seems to be vastly complicated and I'd prefer to go with standards. |